CME information and disclosures
To see contributor disclosures related to this article, click on this reference: [1].
Physicians can earn CME/MOC credit by using this article to address a clinical question and completing a brief evaluation about how they applied the information in their practice.
AMBOSS designates this internet point-of-care activity for a maximum of 0.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
For answers to questions about AMBOSS CME, including how to redeem CME/MOC credit, see "Tips and links" at the bottom of this article.
Quick guide
Diagnostic approach
- ABCDE approach
- 12-lead ECG
- Focused clinical evaluation
- Troponin
- BMP
- CBC
- BNP or NT-pro BNP
- Coagulation panel
- HEART score for patients with NSTE-ACS
- GRACE score
- TIMI score for NSTE-ACS
Diagnostic criteria
- STEMI: ST elevations in two contiguous leads on ECG and elevated troponin
- NSTEMI: no ST elevations on ECG (may have ST depressions or nonspecific changes) and elevated troponin
- Unstable angina: no ST elevations on ECG (may have ST depressions or nonspecific changes) and normal troponin
Management checklist
- Aspirin
- Anticoagulation (e.g., UFH)
- Sublingual nitroglycerin for chest pain relief
- Pulse oximetry
- Supplemental oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation ≥ 90%
- Cardiology consult
- Discuss timing of P2Y12 inhibitor loading with cardiology.
- Continuous telemetry
- STEMI management: reperfusion therapy (emergency revascularization or fibrinolysis if > 120 minutes away from a PCI-capable facility)
- NSTEMI management: Timing of invasive evaluation is based on risk of death or recurrent ischemia.
This calculator is provided by the third-party QXMD, who is solely responsible for its content and functionality.
Created by: QxMD.
This calculator is provided by the third-party QXMD, who is solely responsible for its content and functionality.
Created by: QxMD.
This calculator is provided by the third-party QXMD, who is solely responsible for its content and functionality.
Created by: QxMD.
ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme
ADP: adenosine diphosphate
ECG: electrocardiogram
GP: glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
LBBB: left bundle branch block
PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention
RBBB: right bundle branch block
SpO2: oxygen saturation on pulse oximetry
STEMI: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
UFH: unfractionated heparin
© AMBOSS
Summary
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a group of conditions caused by acute myocardial ischemia, including unstable angina, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). It is caused by partial or complete occlusion of a coronary artery, leading to reduced blood flow to the myocardium. The classic presentation is acute retrosternal chest pain, often described as a dull pressure or tightness, which may be accompanied by shortness of breath, sweating, and nausea. Initial diagnosis involves a 12-lead ECG and measurement of cardiac troponin (cTn) levels. Based on ECG findings, ACS is categorized as ST-elevation ACS (STE-ACS) or non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). NSTE-ACS is further categorized as NSTEMI if serum cTn levels are elevated, or unstable angina if cTn levels are not elevated. Initial management for all patients includes antiplatelet therapy (e.g., aspirin), anticoagulation, and analgesia. Patients with STEMI require immediate revascularization, preferably with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), while the timing of invasive management for NSTE-ACS is based on risk stratification. Adjunctive medical therapy includes statins, beta blockers, and RAAS inhibitors.
This article focuses on the initial management of ACS patients. See “Myocardial infarction” for more details regarding, e.g., histopathology and long-term management.
Overview
| Overview of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [2][3] | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| NSTE-ACS | STE-ACS | ||
| Unstable angina | Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) | ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) | |
| Definition |
|
|
|
| Clinical presentation |
|
||
| Pathophysiology |
|
|
|
| Cardiac troponin |
|
|
|
| ECG findings |
|
|
|
| Revascularization |
|
|
|
| Pharmacological treatment for ACS |
|
||
Subtypes of ACS cannot be differentiated based on clinical presentation alone.
MI is differentiated from unstable angina by the presence of elevated troponins, while the type of MI (NSTEMI vs. STEMI) is determined by ECG findings.
Clinical features
-
Classic presentation [5][6][7]
-
Acute retrosternal chest pain
- Typical: dull, squeezing pressure and/or tightness
- Commonly radiates to left chest, arm, shoulder, neck, jaw, and/or epigastrium
- Precipitated by exertion or stress
- Symptom relief after administration of nitrates is not a diagnostic criterion for cardiac ischemia. [7]
- The peak time of occurrence is usually in the morning.
- See also “Angina.”
- Dyspnea (especially with exertion)
- Pallor
- Nausea, vomiting
- Diaphoresis, anxiety
- Dizziness, lightheadedness, syncope
-
Acute retrosternal chest pain
-
Other possible findings
- Tachycardia, arrhythmias
- Symptoms of heart failure (e.g., orthopnea, pulmonary edema) or cardiogenic shock (e.g., hypotension, tachycardia, cold extremities)
- New heart murmur on auscultation (e.g., new S4)
- Features commonly seen in older adults, individuals with diabetes, and women, e.g.:
- Stabbing, sharp chest pain
- No or minimal chest pain
- Autonomic symptoms (e.g., nausea, diaphoresis)
- See also “Anginal equivalents.”
-
Features of inferior wall infarction
- Epigastric pain
- Bradycardia
- Clinical triad in right ventricular infarction: hypotension, elevated jugular venous pressure, clear lung fields
Classically, it has been taught that STEMI manifests with more severe symptoms than NSTEMI, but this is not always the case.
© AMBOSS
Acute disruption of the blood supply to myocardial muscle triggers ischemia-related chest pain, often described as nonfocal retrosternal chest discomfort or pressure. Accompanying symptoms, including nausea, diaphoresis, lightheadedness, palpitations, and/or dyspnea, may result from increased sympathetic tone and/or reduced cardiac output.
© AMBOSS
© AMBOSS
Initial approach
See “Management of chest pain” for an approach to patients with undifferentiated chest pain.
Approach [3][7]
- ABCDE approach
- Perform a 12-lead ECG within the first 10 minutes of care.
- IV access
- Obtain high-sensitivity cardiac troponin.
- Continuous telemetry and pulse oximetry
- Supplemental oxygen to maintain SpO2 ≥ 90%
- Aspirin if there are no contraindications
- Consider analgesics for cardiac chest pain as needed.
- Repeat testing if the initial ECG and/or cardiac troponin are nondiagnostic.
- Obtain additional laboratory studies (e.g., BMP, CBC) to guide management decisions.
- Assess risk using a risk stratification tool (e.g., GRACE score).
- Manage tachyarrhythmias and treat acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and/or complete heart block as needed.
Obtain an ECG immediately if ACS is a potential diagnosis.
Any patient with ST elevations on ECG requires immediate evaluation for urgent revascularization. Further diagnostic evaluation should not delay care.
A normal ECG or nonspecific ECG changes do not rule out NSTE-ACS. [3]
Initial triage based on ECG findings [3][7]
Follow local rapid diagnostic protocols and tailor the workup and management to individual risk stratification for ACS.
- ST elevations: immediate revascularization in STEMI, preferably PCI
-
No ST elevations: See "Decision pathway for possible NSTE-ACS."
- ST depressions, new T-wave inversions, and/or high clinical suspicion for ACS: NSTE-ACS is likely; begin management of ACS.
- Both nondiagnostic ECG and low or intermediate clinical suspicion for ACS
- Serial ECGs
- hs-cTn 1–2 hours after initial high-sensitivity test or 3–6 hours after initial conventional test [3]
Perform immediate cardiac catheterization (< 2 hours) in patients with NSTE-ACS and cardiogenic shock, electrical or hemodynamic instability, and/or refractory angina. [2][3]
Decision pathway for possible NSTE-ACS [3][7]
-
Management based on troponin levels
- Interpret both the initial troponin value and the change between first and interval values (Δtrop).
- Detectable initial troponin and significant Δtrop : Start ACS management. [8]
- Initial troponin above ULN and high clinical suspicion: Consider starting empiric ACS management before the second troponin.
- Confirm diagnosis with Δtrop.
- Consult cardiology if uncertain.
- Undetectable hs-cTn ≥ 3 hours after symptom onset and low clinical suspicion: NSTEMI can usually be ruled out. [7][9]
-
Inconclusive serial ECG and hs-cTn
- Interpret results based on the patient's overall ACS risk.
- Follow local protocols, use clinical judgment, and consult cardiology as needed. [7]
-
MI is ruled out or remains uncertain
- Evaluate the likelihood of unstable angina.
- Consider additional investigations (e.g., third troponin, cardiac stress testing, CCTA).
- Evaluate alternative causes of chest pain and differential diagnoses of elevated troponin.
- See "Negative initial workup of ACS" for details.
Unstable angina is a clinical diagnosis associated with normal troponin levels. Suggestive ECG changes can support the diagnosis but are not confirmatory.
Diagnosis
ECG findings in ACS [3][8]
ECG findings change over time. Look for STEMI-equivalent ECG findings and repeat ECGs if inconclusive.
ECG changes in STEMI [3]
- New (or presumed new) ST-segment elevations
- ≥ 1 mm in ≥ 2 anatomically contiguous leads (other than leads V2–V3)
-
Leads V2–V3
- Men aged ≥ 40 years: ≥ 2 mm
- Men aged < 40 years: ≥ 2.5 mm
- Women: ≥ 1.5 mm
- Inferior myocardial infarction with right ventricular involvement may exhibit: [8]
- ST elevations ≥ 1 mm in leads aVR and/or V1
- ST elevations ≥ 0.5 mm (or ≥ 1 mm in men aged < 30 years) in leads V3R and V4R
The sequence of ECG changes in ACS over several hours to days: hyperacute T wave → ST elevation → pathological Q wave → T-wave inversion → ST normalization → T-wave normalization
STEMI-equivalent ECG findings [3][8]
-
Posterior myocardial infarction [3]
- ST depressions ≥ 0.5 mm in leads V1–V3
- ST elevations ≥ 0.5 mm in leads V7–V9 [8]
-
Left main coronary artery occlusion or three-vessel coronary artery disease
- ST depressions ≥ 1 mm in ≥ 6 leads [10][11]
- Combined with ST elevation in V1 and/or aVR ST-segment elevation
-
LBBB or RBBB with strong clinical suspicion for myocardial infarction [12]
- New or presumed new LBBB in the absence of symptoms is not a STEMI equivalent.
- Consider diagnostic criteria (e.g., modified Sgarbossa criteria) to evaluate the likelihood of STEMI.
- de Winter T wave: precordial J-point depression with tall, symmetrical T waves [13][14]
- Hyperacute T waves: can be present without ST elevations in the very early stages of ischemia.
Obtain a V7–V9 lead tracing if ST depressions are present in V1–V3, as this may be a sign of a posterior wall STEMI.
Positive modified Sgarbossa criteria can help identify STEMI in symptomatic patients with LBBB for whom ST-segment assessment is difficult.
ECG changes in NSTE-ACS [3][8]
- No persistent ST elevations
-
Nonspecific signs of ischemia may be present, including:
- New (or presumed new) ST-segment depressions
- ≥ 0.5 mm in ≥ 2 anatomically contiguous leads
- Typically horizontal or down-sloping
-
T-wave inversions of > 1 mm in V1–V6 with any of the following:
- Prominent R wave
- R/S ratio > 1
- Transient ST-segment elevation
- New (or presumed new) ST-segment depressions
-
Wellens syndrome after resolution of ischemia [15]
- Biphasic or markedly inverted T waves in leads V2–V3 (sometimes extending to lead V6)
- Absence of Q waves
Avoid excluding a diagnosis of STEMI based on a single ECG, as findings can change over time and with symptom fluctuation.
Laboratory studies [3]
Cardiac troponin [3]
Acute myocardial infarction is characterized by the rise and/or fall of cardiac troponin on repeat testing with at least one elevated value.
- > 99thpercentile ULN: myocardial injury (i.e., NSTEMI or STEMI) [8]
- No detectable elevation (with ECG features of ACS): unstable angina
- Testing intervals
- 1–2 hours after initial high-sensitivity test
- 3–6 hours after initial conventional test
- At symptom recurrence (if suspicion for ACS remains high) and/or appearance of new ECG changes [16]
- Consider at 72 hours as a marker of infarct size. [17]
- Other cardiac biomarkers (e.g., CK-MB, myoglobin): not recommended unless cardiac troponin is unavailable [8]
In patients with a normal ECG, a single high-sensitivity troponin result below the limit of detection ≥ 3 hours after symptom onset is considered sufficient to rule out myocardial infarction. [7]
Additional studies
Obtain the following studies for risk stratification and to help guide management decisions.
- BMP: e.g., to check renal function for GRACE score and anticoagulation dosing [2]
- CBC: to assess for anemia requiring blood transfusion
- BNP or NT-proBNP: to assess for heart failure
- Coagulation panel: for anticoagulation management and assessment of bleeding risk
- Lipid panel
Imaging [3]
- Indication: suspected or confirmed ACS
- Timing: prior to hospital discharge
- Preferred modality: transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)
- Alternatives
- Cardiac MRI (if TTE is nondiagnostic)
- Myocardial perfusion imaging
- Possible findings
- Wall motion abnormalities
- Decreased LV function
- Signs of different conditions that cause chest pain (see “Differential diagnoses of chest pain”)
- Mechanical complications of ACS (e.g., papillary muscle rupture)
- LV thrombus
Urgent TTE is indicated for patients presenting with hemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, or suspected mechanical complications of ACS.
Do not delay treatment of ACS for imaging.
Model illustration of typical ECG changes over time in STEMI; timeframe and ECG morphology vary in clinical practice.
© AMBOSS
12-lead ECG (paper speed: 25 mm/s)
- Normal sinus rhythm
- Heart rate approx. 65/min
- Normal cardiac axis
- ST elevation in leads II, III, aVF
- ST depression in leads aVR, aVL, and V1–V4
These findings suggest an acute inferior STEMI (ST elevation in II, III, and aVF, with reciprocal ST depression in aVL) with posterior extension (reciprocal ST depression in V1–V4; to directly visualize the posterior myocardium the posterior leads V7–V9 may be added to assess for matching ST elevation).
Source: “Figure 2, in: Acute inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction due to delirium tremens: a case report” by M. D. Mirande, G. Kubac, A. T. Nguyen, BMI - Journal of Medical Case Reports, licensed under CC BY 4.0. The supplementary image with overlays of relevant areas was adapted from the image mentioned above (© AMBOSS).
The modified Sgarbossa criteria can be used to evaluate ECGs for acute ischemia in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) or a paced ventricular rhythm. If any of the three criteria is present, acute ischemia is considered likely.
© AMBOSS
This calculator is provided by the third-party QXMD, who is solely responsible for its content and functionality.
Created by: QxMD.
ECG schematic (paper speed: 25 mm/s)
Left: normal T wave
Top right: Benign early repolarization (BER) is a usually benign variant that is associated with high vagal tone, physical fitness, and younger age. These T waves are narrow, asymmetrically peaked, and have concave ascending limbs; the ST segment may be elevated.
Middle right: The peaked T waves of hyperkalemia are narrow and symmetrical.
Bottom right: Hyperacute T waves may occur in the early stages of an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). They are broad and asymmetrically peaked, with no upward concavity of the ascending limb; the ST segment may be elevated.
© AMBOSS
12-lead ECG (paper speed: 25 mm/s)
- Sinus rhythm with a heart rate of ∼ 83/min
- Normal cardiac axis: R > S in leads I and aVF
- Normal QRS complex
- ST elevation in the inferior leads (II, III, aVF; blue overlay) with reciprocal ST depression in aVL (red overlay) and pathological Q waves in III (example indicated by green circle overlay)
Source: “ECG 001” by Glenlarson, Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0. The supplementary image with overlays of relevant areas was adapted from the image mentioned above and licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
12-lead ECG (paper speed 25 mm/s)
– Normal sinus rhythm
– Heart rate: ∼ 75/min
– Normal cardiac axis (R > S in I and II)
– Narrow QRS complexes
– Normal PR interval and QTc
– Marked ST elevation in the inferior leads (II, III, aVF; green overlay) with reciprocal ST depression in I and aVL (red overlay), consistent with an acute inferior STEMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction)
– Additional ST-segment changes in the precordial leads, including mild ST elevation in V3–V5 and slight ST depression in V2, which may reflect right ventricular involvement and/or reciprocal changes from posterior wall involvement. Right-sided (V3R–V6R) and posterior (V7–V9) leads are recommended for further assessment.
Source: “Inferior and RtV MI 12 lead” by James Heilman, MD, Wikimedia Commons, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. The supplementary image with overlays of relevant areas was adapted from the image mentioned above and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
12-lead ECG (paper speed: 25 mm/s)
- Sinus rhythm with a heart rate of ∼ 85/min
- Normal cardiac axis (leads I, II, and III positive, but difficult to interpret because of the ST changes)
- ST elevation in V2–V6, aVL, and slightly in I
- Reciprocal ST depression in leads II, III, and aVF
Source: © IMPP
12-lead ECG (paper speed: 25 mm/s) of 59-year-old male patient, recorded during exercise stress test
- Regular sinus rhythm
- Rate ∼ 100/min
- Normal axis
- Significant ST elevation in V1–V6
Our great thanks to Thomas Vahldieck, MD, for kindly providing this case.
© Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. AMBOSS SE, exclusive licensee.
12-lead ECG (paper speed: 25 mm/s)
– Heart rate: ∼ 110/min
– Normal sinus rhythm
– Normal axis (R > S in I and II)
– Narrow QRS complexes
– Normal PR interval
– Prolonged QT interval (QTc ∼ 650 ms), likely secondary to ischemia
– ST elevation in leads I, aVL, and V1–V4
– Reciprocal ST depression in leads II, III, avF, and V6
These findings are consistent with an extensive anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with septal and lateral extension, likely due to proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) occlusion.
© Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. AMBOSS SE, exclusive licensee.
© Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. AMBOSS SE, exclusive licensee.
© Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. AMBOSS SE, exclusive licensee.
ECG schematic (paper speed: 25 mm/s)
(A) Normal ST segment
(B) Downsloping ST depression (e.g., myocardial ischemia)
(C) Upsloping ST depression (e.g., physical activity, associated with ischemia if prominent t-waves)
(D) Horizontal ST depression (e.g., myocardial ischemia)
(E) Sagging ST depression (e.g., digoxin toxicity)
© AMBOSS
Risk stratification
Risk stratification tools [3]
- In patients with NSTE-ACS, multiple scoring systems are used to:
- Help identify high-risk vs. low-risk patients
- Guide timing of PCI and disposition
- Guide further diagnostic studies
- In patients with STEMI , these tools may be used to calculate mortality risk but are not used to determine management.
Risk stratification tools are not a substitute for clinical judgment.
GRACE score for risk of mortality in ACS [3][18][19]
- Based on the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)
- May be used to inform management and disposition (e.g., ICU admission, timing of intervention in NSTE-ACS)
- Criteria
- Patient age
- Vital signs
- Cardiac and renal function
- Cardiac arrest on presentation
- ECG findings
- Troponin levels
TIMI score for NSTE-ACS [3][20]
- Estimates the risk of mortality, new or recurrent myocardial infarction, or the need for urgent revascularization in patients with NSTE-ACS
- Can help determine the therapeutic regimen and timing for revascularization.
- Criteria
- Age ≥ 65 years
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors (e.g., family history of CAD, diabetes mellitus, smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia)
- Known CAD (stenosis > 50%)
- Episodes of severe angina in the last 24 hours
- Aspirin use in the past 7 days
- ST deviation
- Elevated cardiac biomarkers
HEART score [21][22]
- The HEART score is an acronym of its components:
- History
- ECG
- Age
- Risk factors
- Troponin values
- Risk assessment for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with chest pain presenting to the emergency department
- Can be integrated into decision pathways for early discharge
- Potentially reduces hospital admissions of low-risk patients
- Should not be used in patients with STEMI or those who are hemodynamically unstable
This calculator is provided by the third-party QXMD, who is solely responsible for its content and functionality.
Created by: QxMD.
This calculator is provided by the third-party QXMD, who is solely responsible for its content and functionality.
Created by: QxMD.
This calculator is provided by the third-party QXMD, who is solely responsible for its content and functionality.
Created by: QxMD.
Management
Approach [2][3]
- Consult cardiology; decisions regarding revascularization for ACS are ideally made by a multidisciplinary heart team.
- Continue or initiate continuous telemetry, serial ECGs, and serial troponins (frequency and duration are determined by cardiac risk).
- Supplement oxygen as needed to maintain saturation ≥ 90%. [3]
- Provide pharmacological treatment for ACS.
- Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor
- Parenteral anticoagulation (with, e.g., UFH)
- Analgesia as needed to relieve cardiac chest pain
- Statin therapy, beta blocker therapy, and RAAS inhibitor therapy
- Consider a liberal transfusion strategy for patients with anemia (i.e., target hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL). [3]
- Consider checking cardiac troponin 3–6 hours after PCI to assess for cardiac procedural myocardial injury. [8]
- See “Management of cardiogenic shock,” e.g., for patients with inferior myocardial infarction causing severe RV dysfunction.
Options for initial MI treatment include "MONA-BASH": Morphine, Oxygen, Nitroglycerin, Antiplatelet drugs (aspirin + ADP receptor inhibitor), Beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, Statins, and Heparin. The scope of interventions depends on the patient's risk profile.
Coronary revascularization [2][3]
See "Revascularization in STEMI" and "Revascularization in NSTE-ACS" for details.
-
Coronary angiography with PCI; , i.e., balloon dilation with stent implantation, is the preferred revascularization strategy in ACS. [2][3]
- Primary PCI: PCI that is not preceded by fibrinolysis
- PCI after thrombolysis: PCI performed after fibrinolysis for STEMI
-
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be indicated in selected cases, e.g.: [2][3]
- Large area of myocardium at risk, cardiogenic shock, or hemodynamic instability alongside either of the following:
- Coronary anatomy poorly suited to PCI
- Unsuccessful PCI
- Mechanical complications (e.g., papillary muscle rupture, ventricular septal rupture) requiring surgery
- Large area of myocardium at risk, cardiogenic shock, or hemodynamic instability alongside either of the following:
- Fibrinolytic therapy is used for patients with STEMI if timely access to PCI is not available.
Coronary angiography (right anterior oblique view; cf. illustration) of a patient with acute myocardial infarction
The left anterior descending artery (anterior interventricular artery; green overlay) is occluded (indicated by arrow and dashed lines) distal to the origin of the first diagonal branch (green hatched overlay).
LAD: left anterior descending coronary artery; LCA: left coronary artery; LCX: circumflex branch of the left coronary artery; DB: diagonal branch
Source: © IMPP
Coronary angiography (right anterior oblique view)
The guidewire (white line) and catheter (white dashed line) are visible within the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. A post-stenotic balloon dilatation technique has been used to achieve reperfusion of the occluded vessel. The remaining stenotic portion of the LAD (discontinuity of green overlay) will require the insertion of a stent to establish full reperfusion.
LCA: left coronary artery; LCX: circumflex branch; DB: diagonal branch
Source: © IMPP
Pharmacological treatment
See "Prevention of recurrent myocardial infarction" for long-term management.
Antiplatelet therapy [2][3]
- DAPT with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor reduces the risk of major adverse cardiac events after acute myocardial infarction.
- Timing of aspirin: at presentation
- Timing of P2Y12 inhibitor therapy [23]
- Recommended after assessment of coronary anatomy (i.e., during cardiac catheterization) for most patients with NSTE-ACS
- If delayed (> 24 hours from presentation) cardiac cathetherization is planned, consider pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitor in consultation with cardiology.
- There is insufficient evidence on pretreatment in patients with STEMI; follow local protocols.
- See "Prevention of recurrent myocardial infarction" for more information on the duration of DAPT after acute management.
- See "Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing CABG" for more information on this patient group.
| Antiplatelet therapy for ACS [2][3] | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent | Patient group | Loading dosage | Maintenance dosage |
| Aspirin |
|
|
|
| P2Y12 inhibitor |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Do not administer prasugrel to patients who have had a TIA or stroke. [3]
Pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitor therapy prior to cardiac catheterization is not recommended for most patients with NSTE-ACS due to the increased risk of bleeding, but it can be considered if cardiac catheterization is planned > 24 hours after presentation. [3]
IV cangrelor may be used for patients undergoing PCI who have not received a loading dose of a P2Y12 inhibitor. [2][3]
Anticoagulation [3]
- The choice and duration are determined by the diagnosis and treatment strategy.
- Duration of therapy
- Patients undergoing PCI: Continue until revascularization (and post-PCI for bivalirudin).
- Patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy without planned invasive strategy: Continue for the duration of the hospital stay (maximum 8 days). [3]
- Patients with NSTE-ACS without planned invasive strategy: Continue for the duration of the hospital stay.
| Anticoagulation for ACS [3] | |
|---|---|
| Clinical scenario | Agent |
| Initial therapy |
|
| During PCI |
|
| STEMI with fibrinolytic therapy |
|
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are not routinely recommended but may be administered to selected patients undergoing PCI.
Fondaparinux is contraindicated in patients undergoing PCI because of the risk of catheter thrombosis. [3]
Analgesics for cardiac chest pain [3]
-
Nitrates
- Sublingual nitroglycerin for hemodynamically stable patients with SBP ≥ 90 mm Hg [3]
-
IV nitroglycerin [3]
- Use for pain refractory to sublingual nitroglycerin and/or ACS with hypertension or pulmonary edema.
- Avoid in patients with suspected RV infarction; , SBP < 90 mm Hg, or ↓ SBP > 30 mm Hg below baseline. [3]
- Avoid nitrates in patients who have recently taken a PDE5 inhibitor (e.g., within 24 hours for sildenafil; , or 48 hours for tadalafil). [3]
-
Opioids: for pain resistant to maximally tolerated nitroglycerin
- Morphine [3]
- Fentanyl [3]
Patients with cardiac chest pain that is not relieved with nitrates should receive rapid coronary revascularization. Opioids may improve chest pain symptoms but do not preclude the need for revascularization. [3]
NSAIDs should not be used in patients with suspected or confirmed ACS because they are associated with an increased risk of MACE. [3]
Lipid-lowering therapy [3]
These recommendations apply to patients diagnosed with ACS within the last 12 months.
- All patients: high-intensity statin therapy
- Add a nonstatin lipid-lowering agent (e.g., ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitor, bempedoic acid) for patients with :
- LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL and already on a high-intensity statin
- Statin intolerance
- Consider adding a nonstatin lipid-lowering agent for patients already on a high-intensity statin with LDL-C ≥ 55 mg/dL.
- See “Lipid-lowering therapy for ASCVD” for agents and dosages.
Beta-blocker therapy [3]
- Initiate low-dose oral beta-blocker therapy; within 24 hours of presentation, unless there are contraindications to beta blockers.
- Titrate as tolerated by heart rate and blood pressure.
- Avoid or discontinue in patients with heart failure symptoms or cardiogenic shock.
RAAS inhibitor therapy [3]
- Initiate ACEi or ARB for patients with high-risk features, i.e. :
- LVEF ≤ 40%
- Hypertension
- Diabetes
- Anterior STEMI
- Initiate mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy (i.e., eplerenone) for patients with LVEF ≤ 40% who also have diabetes mellitus and/or symptoms of heart failure.
Other adjunctive therapy [3]
- Low-dose colchicine: Consider to reduce the risk of MACE.
- SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists: Initiate or continue in patients with indications (e.g., diabetes, heart failure); ACS alone is not an indication.
Revascularization in STEMI
Approach [2][3][24]
- Identify patients with STEMI as soon as possible for immediate revascularization. [3]
- Immediate cardiology consult (code STEMI)
- Continuous telemetry
- Treatment of choice: primary PCI [3]
- Within 90 minutes of first medical contact if the patient is at a PCI-capable facility
- Within 120 minutes of first medical contact if hospital transfer for PCI is required
- Consider intravenous fibrinolytic therapy in STEMI in patients with both of the following:
- PCI cannot be performed within 120 minutes (i.e., in patients who require hospital transfer for PCI) [3]
- No contraindications to fibrinolytics for STEMI
- Start pharmacological treatment for ACS.
- Planned PCI
- DAPT with aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor (e.g., prasugrel or ticagrelor); follow local protocols regarding timing of P2Y12 inhibitor administration.
- Anticoagulation with UFH
- Planned fibrinolytic therapy
- DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel
- Anticoagulation with LMWH (e.g., enoxaparin)
- Planned PCI
- Serial troponin levels and ECGs to monitor for cardiac procedural myocardial injury
"Time is muscle": Revascularization should be performed immediately in patients with STEMI. All other interventions can wait.
Percutaneous coronary intervention [2][3]
-
Indications
- Onset of ischemic symptoms < 12 hours prior to first medical contact
- Cardiogenic shock or hemodynamic instability (regardless of symptom duration)
- Patients who have received fibrinolytic therapy
- May be considered in stable patients 12–24 hours after symptom onset
- Contraindication: stable patients (e.g., no ongoing ischemia, acute severe heart failure, or life-threatening arrhythmia) with occluded artery > 24 hours after onset of symptoms
Fibrinolytic therapy in STEMI [3]
-
Indications (all of the following must apply)
- PCI cannot be performed within 120 minutes of first medical contact.
- Symptom onset: < 12 hours or ≥ 12 hours with hemodynamic instability or large infarct size
- No contraindications to fibrinolysis in STEMI
- Timing: within 30 minutes of first medical contact [3]
- Contraindications: See “Contraindications for fibrinolysis in STEMI and STEMI equivalents.”
-
Regimens (one of the following)
- Tenecteplase [3]
- Alteplase [3]
- Reteplase
- Streptokinase
- Postfibrinolysis: Evaluate for evidence of reperfusion (i.e., resolution of chest pain and ST-elevations) and transfer to a PCI-capable facility.
Transfer to a PCI-capable facility after fibronolytic therapy. [3][24]
| Common contraindications for fibrinolytic therapy in STEMI and STEMI equivalents [3] | |
|---|---|
| Absolute contraindications |
|
| Relative contraindications |
|
ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme
ADP: adenosine diphosphate
ECG: electrocardiogram
GP: glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
LBBB: left bundle branch block
PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention
RBBB: right bundle branch block
SpO2: oxygen saturation on pulse oximetry
STEMI: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
UFH: unfractionated heparin
© AMBOSS
Coronary angiography (right anterior oblique view; cf. illustration) of a patient with acute myocardial infarction
The left anterior descending artery (anterior interventricular artery; green overlay) is occluded (indicated by arrow and dashed lines) distal to the origin of the first diagonal branch (green hatched overlay).
LAD: left anterior descending coronary artery; LCA: left coronary artery; LCX: circumflex branch of the left coronary artery; DB: diagonal branch
Source: © IMPP
Coronary angiography (right anterior oblique view)
The guidewire (white line) and catheter (white dashed line) are visible within the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. A post-stenotic balloon dilatation technique has been used to achieve reperfusion of the occluded vessel. The remaining stenotic portion of the LAD (discontinuity of green overlay) will require the insertion of a stent to establish full reperfusion.
LCA: left coronary artery; LCX: circumflex branch; DB: diagonal branch
Source: © IMPP
Revascularization in NSTE-ACS
Approach [2][3]
- Management of NSTE-ACS is determined by the patient's risk of mortality and recurrent ischemic events.
- Hemodynamically or electrically unstable patients and those with intractable angina require an immediate invasive approach (i.e., cardiac catheterization).
- Calculate the GRACE score and/or TIMI score for NSTE-ACS for all patients, to help guide the timing of cardiac catheterization. [2]
- Start pharmacological treatment for ACS, including:
- DAPT with ASA and P2Y12 inhibitor (e.g., ticagrelor); P2Y12 inhibitor is not generally recommended prior to cardiac catheterization.
-
Anticoagulation
- UFH if cardiac catheterization is planned
- LMWH if initial noninvasive approach is planned
- Perform noninvasive cardiac stress testing or coronary CTA for clinically stable patients at low risk of MACE.
- Duration of telemetry and length of stay are determined by ongoing cardiac risk.
Fibrinolytic therapy is not indicated in patients with NSTE-ACS.
Invasive strategy for NSTE-ACS
In the management of NSTE-ACS, an invasive approach involves cardiac catheterization with the intention of proceeding with revascularization (e.g., PCI or CABG) if significant blockages are found. Patient risk stratification guides the timing of cardiac catheterization (i.e., immediate, early, or delayed).
| Invasive strategy for NSTE-ACS [2][3] | ||
|---|---|---|
| Approach | Indications | Timing of coronary angiography |
| Immediate invasive approach |
|
|
| Routine invasive approach |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Selective invasive approach |
|
|
Differential diagnoses
See “Differential diagnoses of chest pain.”
Differential diagnoses of increased troponin [8][27]
-
Cardiovascular causes
- Myocarditis
- Decompensated congestive heart failure
- Pulmonary embolism
- Cardiac arrhythmia, tachycardia
- Aortic dissection
- Hypertensive emergencies
- Structural heart disease
- Myocardial drug toxicity (e.g., doxorubicin)
- Cardiac trauma (including iatrogenic/periprocedural)
- Takotsubo cardiomyopathy
- Ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries
- Stroke
- Wellens syndrome [15]
-
Noncardiovascular causes
- Renal failure
- Critical illness (e.g., sepsis)
- Hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism
Differential diagnoses of ST elevations on ECG [28]
- Early repolarization
- LBBB
- Brugada syndrome
- Myocarditis
- Pericarditis
- Left ventricular aneurysm [29]
- Ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries (e.g., coronary artery spasm, coronary microvascular dysfunction)
- Pulmonary embolism
- Hyperkalemia
- Tricyclic antidepressant use
- Poor ECG lead placement
The differential diagnoses listed here are not exhaustive.
Complications
See also “Complications of myocardial infarction.”
Mechanical complications [3]
- Ventricular septal rupture (i.e., acute ventricular septal defect)
- Contained ventricular rupture (pseudoaneurysm)
- Papillary muscle rupture or infarction
- Ventricular free wall rupture
Patients with mechanical complications after acute MI should be managed in a dedicated cardiac surgery center. [3]
Electrical complications [3]
-
Ventricular arrhythmias
- Ventricular tachycardia
- Ventricular fibrillation
-
Bradyarrhythmias
- Mobitz type II AV block
- High-grade AV block
- Alternating bundle branch block
- Third-degree AV block
Other [3]
- Heart failure (see "Management of acute heart failure" for more details, including guidance on fluid management)
- Early infarct-associated pericarditis
- Postmyocardial infarction syndrome (Dressler syndrome)
- LV thrombus
We list the most important complications. The selection is not exhaustive.
Disposition
Cardiac intensive care unit or ICU [3]
- Ongoing angina
- Hemodynamic instability
- Uncontrolled arrhythmias
- Suboptimal reperfusion
- Cardiogenic shock
Telemetry unit [3]
- Patients at low risk for cardiac arrhythmias: Monitor for up to 24 hours (or until coronary revascularization).
- Patients at intermediate or high risk of cardiac arrhythmias: Consider monitoring for > 24 hours.
Negative initial workup for ACS [7]
Approach
- Rule out other potential causes of chest pain, including myocardial infarction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA). [30]
- Use risk stratification for ACS (e.g., the HEART score) to determine the short-term risk of MACE.
- Consider the need for observation or admission for further diagnostics based on the risk of MACE.
Risk-based management [7]
-
High-risk (e.g., HEART score ≥ 7)
- Inpatient admission
- Obtain invasive coronary angiography during admission.
-
Intermediate-risk (e.g., HEART score 4–6)
- Noninvasive testing (i.e., cardiac stress test or coronary CT angiography) is usually required prior to discharge.
- In patients with a recent negative workup for CAD , no further testing is indicated prior to discharge.
-
Low-risk (e.g., HEART score ≤ 3)
- No further testing is indicated prior to discharge from the ED.
- Ensure outpatient follow-up.
- Outpatient coronary artery calcium scoring may be considered for ASCVD risk evaluation.
Follow-up
- Prompt primary care and cardiology follow-up
- Confirm referral to cardiac rehabilitation. [3]
- Screen for and treat depression and anxiety. [2]
- Lipid profile 4–8 weeks after discharge; adjust therapy as needed (see “Lipid management in the first 12 months post-ACS”). [3]
- Repeat TTE 6–12 weeks after discharge if LV function was decreased during hospitalization. [3]
- Ensure annual influenza vaccination. [3]
- Perform a medication reconciliation and reinforce adherence. [3]
Related One-Minute Telegram
- One-Minute Telegram 112-2024-1/3: Colchicine for inflammation after MI: not a silver bullet?
- One-Minute Telegram 90-2024-2/3: Post-PCI care: de-escalating DAPT in high-risk patients
- One-Minute Telegram 86-2023-1/3: Guideline-based preventive care could save a Million Hearts
- One-Minute Telegram 85-2023-1/3: ECLS no panacea for ischemic cardiogenic shock
- One-Minute Telegram 83-2023-3/3: Older adults benefit from complete revascularization after acute MI
- One-Minute Telegram 66-2023-1/3: 2021 AHA/ACC model overestimates the risk of coronary artery disease
- One-Minute Telegram 66-2023-2/3: Chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide: not so different after all
- One-Minute Telegram 61-2022-1/3: Restock your aspirin and laceration repair kits - it’s almost Halloween!
- One-Minute Telegram 59-2022-1/3: Sugar free is not risk free
- One-Minute Telegram 59-2022-2/3: Asporvapril? Ramaspastatin? Single polypill for secondary ASCVD prevention better than usual care
- One-Minute Telegram 51-2022-1/3: Is all chest pain created equal?
- One-Minute Telegram 6-2020-3/3: Statins underprescribed in patients with PAD
- One-Minute Telegram 5-2020-3/3: Aspirin discontinuation with continued P2Y12 inhibitors may be beneficial for select patients after PCI
Interested in the newest medical research, distilled down to just one minute? Sign up for the One-Minute Telegram in “Tips and links” below.
External Resources
- Sign up for the One-Minute Telegram
- 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
- 2023 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes
- 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain
- 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization
- 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
- CME Program Overview
- Internet Point-of-Care CME
References
- Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. "2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization". J Am Coll Cardiol. 79(2). :e21-e129. (2022)
- Rao SV, O’Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. "2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines". Circulation. (2025)
- Braunwald E. "Unstable angina and non–ST elevation myocardial infarction". Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 185(9). :924-932. (2012)
- Fox KAA, Dabbous OH, Goldberg RJ, et al. "Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE)". BMJ. 333(7578). :1091. (2006)
- Fox KAA, FitzGerald G, Puymirat E, et al. "Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk? Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score". BMJ Open. 4(2). :e004425. (2014)
- Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJLM, et al. "The TIMI Risk Score for Unstable Angina/Non–ST Elevation MI". JAMA. 284(7). :835. (2000)
- Six AJ, Backus BE, Kelder JC. "Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score". Netherlands Heart Journal. 16(6). :191-196. (2008)
- Tomaszewski CA, Nestler D, Shah KH, et al. "Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Evaluation and Management of Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes". Ann Emerg Med. 72(5). :e65-e106. (2018)
- Jameson JL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, et al. "Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, Twentieth Edition (Vol.1 & Vol.2)". McGraw-Hill Education / Medical. (2018). ISBN: 9781259644030
- Walls R, Hockberger R, Gausche-Hill M. "Rosen's Emergency Medicine". Elsevier Health Sciences. (2018). ISBN: 9780323354790
- Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. "2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain". J Am Coll Cardiol. 78(22). :e187-e285. (2021)
- Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet J-P, et al. "2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation". Eur Heart J. 37(3). :267-315. (2015)
- Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. "Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018)". J Am Coll Cardiol. 72(18). :2231-2264. (2018)
- Kontos M, de Lemos J, Deitelzweig S, et al. "2022 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Evaluation and Disposition of Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department". J Am Coll Cardiol. 80(20). :1925-1960. (2022)
- O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, et al. "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction". Circulation. 127(4). (2013)
- Engel J, Brady W, Mattu A, Perron A. "Electrocardiographic ST segment elevation: Left ventricular aneurysm". Am J Emerg Med. 20(3). :238-242. (2002)
- Boeddinghaus J, Nestelberger T, Twerenbold R, et al. "Direct Comparison of 4 Very Early Rule-Out Strategies for Acute Myocardial Infarction Using High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I". Circulation. 135(17). :1597-1611. (2017)
- Tamis-Holland J, Jneid H, Reynolds H, et al. "Contemporary Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Myocardial Infarction in the Absence of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association". Circulation. 139(18). (2019)
- "Contributor Disclosures - Acute coronary syndrome. All of the relevant financial relationships listed for the following individuals have been mitigated: Jan Schlebes (medical editor, is a shareholder in Fresenius SE & Co KGaA); Esther Welzel (illustrator, is an independent contractor for Fluentis Schweiz). None of the other individuals in control of the content for this article reported relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies. For details, please review our full conflict of interest (COI) policy:"
- Kjell Nikus, Yochai Birnbaum, Markku Eskola, et al. "Updated Electrocardiographic Classification of Acute Coronary Syndromes". Current Cardiology Reviews. (2014)
- Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. "2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation". Eur Heart J. 39(2). :119-177. (2017)
- Smith SW, Dodd KW, Henry TD, Dvorak DM, Pearce LA. "Diagnosis of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle Branch Block With the ST-Elevation to S-Wave Ratio in a Modified Sgarbossa Rule". Ann Emerg Med. 60(6). :766-776. (2012)
- de Winter RJ, Verouden NJW, Wellens HJJ, Wilde AAM. "A New ECG Sign of Proximal LAD Occlusion". N Engl J Med. 359(19). :2071-2073. (2008)
- de Winter RW, Adams R, Verouden NJW, de Winter RJ. "Precordial junctional ST-segment depression with tall symmetric T-waves signifying proximal LAD occlusion, case reports of STEMI equivalence". J Electrocardiol. 49(1). :76-80. (2016)
- Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. "2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines". Circulation. 144(22). :e368-e454. (2021)
- Licka M. "Troponin T concentrations 72 hours after myocardial infarction as a serological estimate of infarct size". Heart. 87(6). :520-524. (2002)
- Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. "2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes". Eur Heart J. 44(38). :3720-3826. (2023)
- Promes SB, Glauser JM, Smith MD, et al. "Clinical Policy: Emergency Department Management of Patients Needing Reperfusion Therapy for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction". Ann Emerg Med. 70(5). :724-739. (2017)
- Squire IB, et al. "Humoral and cellular immune responses up to 7·5 years after administration of streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction". Eur Heart J. 20(17). :1245-1252. (1999)
- Switaj TL, et al. "Acute Coronary Syndrome: Current Treatment.". Am Fam Physician. 95(4). :232-240. (2017)
- Kasper DL, Fauci AS, Hauser SL, et al. "Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine". McGraw-Hill Education. (2015). ISBN: 9780071802161
- Le T, Bhushan V, Chen V, King M. "First Aid for the USMLE Step 2 CK". McGraw-Hill Education. (2015). ISBN: 9780071844574
- Marx JA, Hockberger RS, Walls RM et al. "Rosen's Emergency Medicine - Concepts and Clinical Practice". Saunders. (2013). ISBN: 9781455706051
- Reeder GS, Awtry E, Mahler SA. "Initial evaluation and management of suspected acute coronary syndrome (myocardial infarction, unstable angina) in the emergency department". UpToDate. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/initial-evaluation-and-management-of-suspected-acute-coronary-syndrome-myocardial-infarction-unstable-angina-in-the-emergency-department?source=machineLearning&search=atypical%20Mi%20causes&selectedTitle=2~150§ionRank=1&anchor=H14#H14. [2016-10-03]
- Goljan EF. "Rapid Review Pathology". Elsevier Saunders. (2018). ISBN: 9780323476683
- Le T, Bhushan V, Sochat M, Chavda Y, Zureick A. "First Aid for the USMLE Step 1 2018". McGraw-Hill Medical. (2017). ISBN: 1260116123
- European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). "EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones.". J Hepatol. 65(1). :146-181. (2016)
- Tao Le, Vikas Bhushan, Deol M, Reyes G. "First Aid for the USMLE Step 2 CK, Tenth Edition". McGraw-Hill Education. (2018). ISBN: 9781260440294
- Ramjane Khalill, MD, Lei Han, et al. "The use of risk scores for stratification of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients". Experimental & Clinical Cardiology. (2009)
- Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. "2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes". J Am Coll Cardiol. (2014)
- Wu S-D. "Effects of narcotic analgesic drugs on human Oddi’s sphincter motility". World Journal of Gastroenterology. 10(19). :2901. (2004)
- Thune A, Baker RA, Saccone GTP, Owen H, Toouli J. "Differing effects of pethidine and morphine on human sphincter of Oddi motility". Br J Surg. 77(9). :992-995. (1990)
- Masudi T, Capitelli-McMahon H, Anwar S. "Acute pain management in symptomatic cholelithiasis". World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 8(10). :713. (2016)
- Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, et al. "Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit". Crit Care Med. 41(1). :263-306. (2013)
- Schrör K, Nitschmann S. "Kardiovaskuläre Sicherheit von Celecoxib". Internist (Berl). 58(8). :863-865. (2017)
- Blondell RD, Azadfard M, Wisniewski A. "Pharmacologic therapy for acute pain". Am Fam Physician. 87(11). :766-72. (2013)
- McCarberg BH, Argoff CE. "Topical diclofenac epolamine patch 1.3% for treatment of acute pain caused by soft tissue injury". Int J Clin Pract. 64(11). :1546-1553. (2010)
- Blondell R, Azadfard M, Wisniewski A. "Pharmacologic Therapy for Acute Pain". Am Fam Physician. (2013)
- Rushfeldt CF, Sveinbjørnsson B, Søreide K, Vonen B. "Risk of anastomotic leakage with use of NSAIDs after gastrointestinal surgery". Int J Colorectal Dis. 26(12). :1501-1509. (2011)
- Jain S, Ting HT, Bell M, et al. "Utility of Left Bundle Branch Block as a Diagnostic Criterion for Acute Myocardial Infarction". Am J Cardiol. 107(8). :1111-1116. (2011)
- Chang AM, Shofer FS, Tabas JA, et al. "Lack of association between left bundle-branch block and acute myocardial infarction in symptomatic ED patients". Am J Emerg Med. 27(8). :916-921. (2009)
- Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Barbagelata A, et al. "Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Evolving Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle-Branch Block". N Engl J Med. 334(8). :481-487. (1996)
- Nikus K, Pahlm O, Wagner G, et al. "Electrocardiographic classification of acute coronary syndromes: a review by a committee of the International Society for Holter and Non-Invasive Electrocardiology". J Electrocardiol. 43(2). :91-103. (2010)
- Montalescot G, Pitt B, Lopez de Sa E, et al. "Early eplerenone treatment in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction without heart failure: The Randomized Double-Blind Reminder Study". Eur Heart J. 35(34). :2295-2302. (2014)
- Khanna IK, Pillarisetti S. "Buprenorphine - an attractive opioid with underutilized potential in treatment of chronic pain.". Journal of pain research. 8. :859-70. (2015)
- Widimsky P, Rohac F, Stasek J, et al. "Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?". Eur Heart J. 33(1). :86-95. (2011)