Summary
Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome caused by structural or functional impairment of ventricular filling and/or ejection of blood. The three main underlying causes of HF are coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension; incidence increases with age. Typical clinical features include dyspnea and peripheral edema. The initial diagnostic workup includes measurement of natriuretic peptide levels, echocardiography, chest x-ray, and an ECG. Classification of patients based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), symptoms and functional capacity (NYHA class), and ACC/AHA stage helps guide management. Guideline-directed medical therapy for HF includes lifestyle modifications and treatment of associated conditions (e.g., hypertension) and comorbidities (e.g., anemia), along with a combination of pharmacological agents that reduce cardiac workload (e.g., SGLT2is, ARNIs, beta blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists). Treatment options for patients with advanced HF, a highly morbid condition, include device therapy for HF, mechanical circulatory support, and/or heart transplant. Acute heart failure (AHF) may occur as an exacerbation of HF (i.e., acute decompensated HF) or be caused by an acute cardiac condition such as myocardial infarction.
Heart failure in children is covered separately.
Definitions
Preferred terminology [1][2][3]
- Heart failure (HF): a complex clinical syndrome in which there is structural or functional impairment of ventricular filling and/or ejection of blood [1]
- Congestive heart failure (CHF): HF with signs and/or symptoms of fluid overload, e.g., peripheral edema, jugular venous distention
- Left heart failure (LHF): HF caused by structural or functional impairment of the left heart circulatory system that results in tissue hypoperfusion and/or increased pulmonary capillary pressure
- Right heart failure (RHF): HF caused by structural or functional impairment of the right heart circulatory system that results in impaired blood flow to the pulmonary circulation and/or elevated venous pressures [4]
- Biventricular (global) heart failure: HF in which both the left and right ventricles are affected, resulting in the development of both RHF and LHF symptoms
- Chronic compensated heart failure: HF with stable symptoms
- Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF): AHF due to decompensation of preexisting disease and/or cardiomyopathy (most common) [5]
- Systolic dysfunction: reduced ventricular contractility resulting in ventricular enlargement and reduced ejection fraction [6]
- Diastolic dysfunction: reduced ventricular compliance characterized by elevated filling pressures, abnormal relaxation, and increased ventricular stiffness [7]
- Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT): the stepwise use of evidence-based clinical evaluation, diagnostic studies, medication, and procedures to manage patients with HF
The term “heart failure” is preferred over “congestive heart failure” because not all patients present with symptoms of fluid overload. [8]
Historical terminology [1][2]
- Systolic HF has been used as a synonym for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but is no longer favored because individuals with HFrEF have both systolic and diastolic dysfunction.
- Diastolic HF has been used as a synonym for HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) but is no longer favored because individuals with HFpEF have both systolic and diastolic dysfunction.
Epidemiology
- Approx. 1.9% of the US population (6.2 million individuals) has HF. [9]
- Incidence is higher among African American and Hispanic individuals. [10]
- Incidence increases with age: Approx. 20% of individuals aged > 75 years are affected. [11]
- An increasing proportion of patients with HF have HFpEF (≥ 50%). [1]
Epidemiological data refers to the US, unless otherwise specified.
Etiology
-
Cardiovascular
- Ischemic heart disease (50% of HFrEF cases): coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction [12]
- Hypertension
- Valvular heart disease
- Arrhythmias and heart rhythm-related conditions, e.g., tachycardia, high PVC burden, RV pacing
- Myocarditis, e.g., infectious, toxic, autoimmune
-
Cardiomyopathies
- Dilated cardiomyopathy, e.g., hemochromatosis
- Stress-induced cardiomyopathy
- Peripartum cardiomyopathy
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- Infiltrative restrictive cardiomyopathy, e.g., amyloidosis, sarcoidosis
- Constrictive pericarditis
-
Endocrine/metabolic
- Diabetes mellitus [13]
- Obesity
- Thyroid disease
- Kidney disease [14]
-
Pulmonary
- COPD
- Pulmonary artery hypertension, cor pulmonale
-
Toxic
- Chemotherapy
- Alcohol, tobacco
- Cocaine, methamphetamines
-
Other
- Familial or genetic
- Autoimmune, e.g., SLE, giant cell arteritis
The three major causes of HF are CAD, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Patients typically have multiple risk factors that contribute to the development of HF. [1]
Classification
Classification of HF by LVEF [1]
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): HF with reduced stroke volume, normal or reduced EDV, preserved LVEF : (≥ 50%), and evidence of increased LV filling pressures, e.g., increased natriuretic peptides, hemodynamic measurements [1][2]
- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF): HF with reduced stroke volume and reduced LVEF (≤ 40%) [1][12]
- Heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF): previous HFrEF, with a follow-up LVEF measurement > 40% [1]
- Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF): HF with an LVEF 41–49% and evidence of increased LV filling pressures, e.g., increased natriuretic peptides, hemodynamic measurements [1][2]
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) stages [1]
The ACC/AHA classification system categorizes patients based on an objective assessment of clinical features and diagnostic findings.
| ACC/AHA stages of heart failure [1] | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stage | Definition and criteria | ||
| Stage A HF: at risk |
|
|
|
| Stage B HF: pre-HF |
|
||
| Stage C HF: symptomatic HF |
|
||
| Stage D HF: advanced HF |
|
||
Patients with stage C HF will always remain categorized as such, even if they become asymptomatic (i.e., NYHA class I) with treatment. [1]
New York Heart Association NYHA functional classification [1]
The NYHA classification system is used to assess limitations in physical activity and symptoms of patients with symptomatic HF (i.e., ACC/AHA stages C and D); it helps determine treatment eligibility and prognosis.
| NYHA functional classification [1][2] | |
|---|---|
| NYHA class | Characteristics |
| Class I |
|
| Class II |
|
| Class III |
|
| Class IV |
|
Pathophysiology
Cardiac output, which is stroke volume times heart rate, is determined by three factors: preload, afterload, and ventricular contractility.
Underlying mechanism of reduced cardiac output
-
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
- Reduced contractility → systolic ventricular dysfunction → decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) → decreased cardiac output
- Causes include:
- Damage and loss of myocytes (e.g., following myocardial infarction, CAD, dilated cardiomyopathy)
- Cardiac arrhythmias
- High-output conditions (see “High-output heart failure” below)
-
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
- Decreased ventricular compliance → diastolic ventricular dysfunction → reduced ventricular filling and increased diastolic pressure → decreased cardiac output (while the left ventricular ejection fraction remains normal)
- Causes include:
- Increased stiffness of the ventricle (e.g., long-standing arterial hypertension with ventricular wall hypertrophy, restrictive cardiomyopathy)
- Impaired relaxation of the ventricle (e.g., constrictive pericarditis, pericardial tamponade)
-
Left-sided heart failure (HFrEF and/or HFpEF)
- Increased left ventricular afterload: increased mean aortic pressure; (e.g., arterial hypertension), outflow obstruction (e.g., aortic stenosis)
- Increased left ventricular preload: left ventricular volume overload (e.g., backflow into the left ventricle caused by aortic insufficiency)
-
Right-sided heart failure
- Increased right ventricular afterload: increase in pulmonary artery pressure (e.g., pulmonary hypertension)
- Increased right ventricular preload: right ventricular volume overload (e.g., tricuspid valve regurgitation, left-to-right shunt)
Consequences of decompensated heart failure
- Forward failure: reduced cardiac output → poor organ perfusion → organ dysfunction (e.g., hypotension, renal dysfunction)
-
Backward failure
- Left ventricle: increased left-ventricular volumes or pressures → backup of blood into lungs → increased pulmonary capillary pressure; → cardiogenic pulmonary edema (presenting with orthopnea) and increased pulmonary artery pressure
- Right ventricle: increased pulmonary artery pressure → reduced right-sided cardiac output → systemic venous congestion → peripheral edema and progressive congestion of internal organs (e.g., liver, stomach)
- Nutmeg liver: the macroscopic appearance of the liver which resembles a nutmeg seed due to ischemia and fatty degeneration from hepatic venous congestion
HF is characterized by reduced cardiac output that results in venous congestion and poor systemic perfusion.
Compensation mechanisms
The compensation mechanisms are meant to maintain the cardiac output when stroke volume is reduced.
- Increased adrenergic activity : increase in heart rate, blood pressure, and ventricular contractility
-
Increase of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity (RAAS): activated following decrease in renal perfusion secondary to reduction of stroke volume and cardiac output
-
↑ Angiotensin II secretion results in:
- Peripheral vasoconstriction → ↑ systemic blood pressure → ↑ afterload
- Vasoconstriction of the efferent arterioles → ↓ net renal blood flow and ↑ intraglomerular pressure → maintained GFR
- ↑ Aldosterone secretion → ↑ renal Na+ and H2O reabsorption → ↑ preload
-
↑ Angiotensin II secretion results in:
-
Secretion of natriuretic peptides: ↑ intracellular smooth muscle cGMP → vasodilation → hypotension and decreased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure → cleavage of the prohormone proBNP into BNP and NT-proBNP
- Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP): ventricular myocyte hormone released in response to increased ventricular filling and stretching
- NT-proBNP: inert biomarker produced in cardiomyocytes from the cleavage of the prohormone proBNP
The pressure-volume (P-V) loop in systolic dysfunction (yellow): Loss of contractility in systolic dysfunction reduces the slope of the line depicting the end-systolic P-V relationship. Therefore, the end-systolic volume (top left corner of P-V loop) appears increased compared to the normal P-V loop (green). The end-diastolic volume (bottom right corner of P-V loop) is also increased because of normal venous return to a high end-systolic volume. This higher end-diastolic volume partially increases the stroke volume via the Frank-Starling mechanism.
The P-V loop in diastolic dysfunction (blue): Increased stiffness of the ventricle in diastolic dysfunction means that the line depicting the diastolic P-V curve is shifted upwards and to the left. For any given diastolic volume, the ventricular pressure is higher in a dysfunctional heart compared to a healthy heart (green loop), and the end-diastolic volume is reduced compared to a healthy heart (bottom right corner of P-V loop). Reduced end-diastolic volume with preserved ejection fraction means that the end-systolic volume (top left corner of P-V loop) will be reduced compared to a heart with normal diastolic function.
© AMBOSS
© AMBOSS
Liver (sagittal section; lateral view)
Yellow streaks of fat and speckles of dark spots can be seen throughout the hepatic tissue.
These findings are consistent with hepatic congestion. The dilated liver sinusoids appear as dark spots. The lack of nutrient supply to the hepatocytes surrounding the central vein leads to additional atrophy and fatty degeneration, causing the liver to resemble a nutmeg seed – hence the name “nutmeg liver.”
Source: © IMPP
Reduced cardiac output results in the activation of compensatory mechanisms (i.e., ADH and BNP production, activation of the renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic nervous system) in an attempt to restore cardiac output.
Cardiac remodeling and increases in afterload both have a negative effect on cardiac output. Increases in heart rate and preload have a positive effect on cardiac output. The net effect of these compensatory mechanisms may be sufficient to restore cardiac output. If not, the cycle repeats.
© AMBOSS
Flowchart summarizing the biochemical and physiological effects of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and current pharmacological inhibitors (overlay).
© AMBOSS
Clinical features
General features of heart failure
- Nocturia [15]
- Fatigue
- Tachycardia, various arrhythmias
- S3/S4 gallop on auscultation
- Pulsus alternans
- Cachexia [16]
Clinical features of left-sided heart failure
-
Symptoms of pulmonary congestion
- Dyspnea , orthopnea (a sensation of shortness of breath that occurs upon lying down and is relieved by sitting up)
- Pulmonary edema
-
Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea
- Nocturnal bouts of coughing and acute shortness of breath
- Caused by reabsorption of peripheral edema at night → increased venous return
-
Cardiac asthma
- Increased pressure in the bronchial arteries → airway compression and bronchospasm
- Symptoms mimic asthma, with shortness of breath, wheezing, and coughing. [17]
-
Physical examination findings [18]
- Bilateral basilar rales may be audible on auscultation.
- Laterally displaced apical heart beat (precordial palpation beyond the midclavicular line)
- Coolness and pallor of lower extremities
Clinical features of right-sided heart failure
-
Symptoms of fluid retention and increased CVP
- Peripheral pitting edema: as a result of fluid transudation due to increased venous pressure
-
Hepatic venous congestion symptoms
- Abdominal pain
- Jaundice
- Other symptoms of organ congestion (e.g., nausea, loss of appetite in congestive gastropathy)
-
Physical examination findings
- Jugular venous distention: visible swelling of the jugular veins due to an increase in CVP and venous congestion
- Kussmaul sign
- Hepatosplenomegaly: may result in cardiac cirrhosis and ascites
- Hepatojugular reflux: jugular venous congestion induced by exerting manual pressure over the patient's liver → ↑ right heart volume overload → inability of the right heart to pump additional blood → visible jugular venous distention that persists for several seconds
The tissue is markedly edematous above the line to which the patient's sock had previously been pulled up. After applying pressure to the pretibial area, the residual indentation characteristic of pitting edema becomes visible.
© AMBOSS
In this patient with kidney and heart failure, edema of the foot indicates interstitial accumulation of fluids.
Source: "1 Oedematous foot, heart and renal failure", John Campbell, Flickr licensed under Public Domain
© AMBOSS
© AMBOSS
© AMBOSS
Subtypes and variants
High-output heart failure
- Definition: heart failure secondary to conditions associated with a high-output state, in which cardiac output is elevated to meet the peripheral tissue oxygen demands
-
Etiology: conditions that lead to an increased cardiac demand (high-output state) [19]
- Physiological causes
- Pregnancy
- Fever
- Exercise
- Other causes
- Class III obesity
- Advanced cirrhosis
- Anemia
- Systemic arteriovenous fistulas
- Paget disease of bone
- Hyperthyroidism; thyroid storm
- Wet beriberi (vitamin B1 deficiency)
- Sepsis
- Multiple myeloma
- Glomerulonephritis
- Polycythemia vera
- Carcinoid heart disease [20]
- Physiological causes
- Pathophysiology: peripheral vasodilation or arteriovenous shunting → ↓ in systemic vascular resistance → ↑ heart rate and stroke volume → ↑ cardiac output
-
Clinical features
- Symptoms shared with low-output HF
- Dyspnea, tachypnea
- Tachycardia
- Peripheral edema
- Fatigue
- Low blood pressure
- Symptoms specific to high-output HF
- Midsystolic murmur, S3 gallop
- Jugular distention with an audible hum over the internal jugular vein
- Pulsatile tinnitus
- Bounding peripheral pulses
- Laterally displaced apex beat
- Symptoms shared with low-output HF
-
Diagnostics
- Primarily a clinical diagnosis
- X-ray and echocardiography: cardiomegaly
-
Treatment
-
Heart failure management
- Symptom relief
- Hemodynamic stabilization
- Treatment of the underlying condition
-
Heart failure management
X-ray chest (AP view) of a patient with an arteriovenous fistula
Generalized enlargement of the cardiac silhouette is accompanied by prominent upper lobe pulmonary vessels (examples indicated by arrowheads) and widespread parenchymal air space opacities (green overlay).
In the setting of a high-flow arteriovenous fistula, an increase in preload from the shunting of blood from the left-sided circulation into the right-sided circulation can result in increased cardiac output. Increased workload may eventually lead to high-output cardiac failure.
Source: “Fig 1, In: Idiopathic Extremity Arteriovenous Fistula: A Rare Etiology of Cardiac Failure” by Ninama AC, Bellur S, Balasundaram S, Cureus, licensed under CC BY 4.0. The supplementary image with overlays of relevant areas was adapted from the image mentioned above (© AMBOSS).
Diagnosis
See “Diagnosis of AHF” for the evaluation of acute decompensated HF.
General principles
- Initial workup
- Comprehensive clinical evaluation, focused on acuity and volume status
- ECG, CXR, and TTE
- BNP and additional laboratory studies, e.g., CBC, HbA1c
- HF is confirmed if a patient has clinical features of HF attributable to structural or functional cardiac abnormalities and either: [1][2]
- Elevated natriuretic peptides
- Evidence of cardiogenic pulmonary or systemic congestion
- If the diagnosis is uncertain, consider:
- A validated clinical composite score, e.g., Framingham heart failure diagnostic criteria
- Advanced studies, e.g., right heart catheterization
- Refer to a cardiologist or an HF specialist if advanced HF is suspected.
Multiple conditions can mimic HF and/or impact therapeutic decisions, e.g., anemia or kidney or liver failure. No single laboratory finding, imaging study, or clinical feature either excludes or is diagnostic for HF. [1][2]
Clinical evaluation
-
Medical history
- Family history of cardiac disease [1]
- Lifestyle and behavioral factors
- Social determinants of health
- Systemic and comorbid conditions
-
Physical examination
- Vital signs and volume status assessment [1]
- Findings suggestive of other underlying conditions, e.g.:
- Clinical features of hemochromatosis
- Hypertensive retinopathy on fundoscopic examination
Laboratory studies [1][21]
BNP or NT-proBNP
- Indication: all patients with suspected HF
- Uses: to help confirm the diagnosis and assess disease severity and prognosis [1][22]
-
Interpretation
- Elevated levels in patients with classic symptoms of HF support the diagnosis (high predictive index). [2][22]
- HF is unlikely if:
- BNP is < 35 pg/mL or NT-proBNP is < 125 pg/mL in chronic HF [2][12]
- BNP is < 100 pg/mL or NT-proBNP is < 300 pg/mL in AHF [22]
- Several conditions can affect levels of BNP and NT-proBNP. [1][22]
- Increased levels: e.g., in advanced age, compromised kidney function, atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias
- Decreased levels: e.g., in obesity, flash pulmonary edema, pericardial constriction [12]
Normal BNP or NT-proBNP levels do not exclude HF. Always consider the complete clinical picture. [1][21]
Additional laboratory studies
Order the following studies to assess for causes of HF, comorbidities, and suitability for pharmacological treatment.
- CBC: screening for anemia and signs of infection
-
BMP
- Creatinine: normal or ↑
- Na+: normal or ↓; hyponatremia may indicate a poor prognosis. [23]
- HbA1c or fasting glucose: diabetes mellitus screening
- Liver chemistries: Elevations, particularly of cholestatic enzymes, can indicate hepatic venous congestion.
- Fasting lipid panel: screening for lipid disorders
- TSH: to assess thyroid function
-
Iron studies: to assess for iron deficiency in HF
- Serum ferritin < 100 ng/mL [24]
- Or serum ferritin < 300 ng/mL with transferrin saturation < 20% [24]
-
Cardiac troponin T/I: may be useful for risk stratification [25]
- Often elevated in patients with HF
- In patients with significant elevations and a serial increase in value, ACS must be ruled out. [26][27]
Most patients with HF (> 85%) have two or more associated chronic conditions. [1]
Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) [1][21]
-
Indications
- All patients with suspected HF (preferred initial imaging modality) [1][21]
- Patients receiving treatment with a change in clinical status
- Patients undergoing evaluation for device therapy
-
Findings
- LV systolic dysfunction and/or diastolic dysfunction
- Quantitative measurement of LVEF
- Atrial and ventricular size and thickness
- Evidence of complications, e.g.:
- Cardiac dyssynchrony, functional mitral regurgitation, left atrial enlargement [28]
- Pericardial and/or pleural effusion [29]
- Underlying causes: e.g., LV hypertrophy in hypertension, regional wall motion abnormalities due to CAD
Chest x-ray [1]
- Indication: all patients with suspected HF; especially useful in AHF
-
Findings
- Changes to the cardiac silhouette
- Cardiomegaly, i.e., cardiothoracic ratio > 0.5 [30]
- Boot-shaped heart on PA view: RV enlargement
- Signs of pericardial effusion (e.g., water bottle heart)
- X-ray findings of pulmonary congestion
- Signs of concomitant heart conditions, including:
- Valvular calcifications in valvular disease
- Pericardial calcification in constrictive pericarditis
- Changes to the cardiac silhouette
12-lead ECG [1][31][32]
- Indications: all patients with suspected HF
-
Findings
- Some patients may have a normal ECG, especially those with HFpEF.
- Changes associated with the etiology of HF and other cardiovascular comorbidities, e.g., ECG changes in STEMI, arrhythmias [1]
- Abnormalities related to HF (common but mainly nonspecific), e.g.:
- ECG signs of LV hypertrophy (e.g., positive Sokolow-Lyon index) [33]
- ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities (e.g., ST depression)
- P wave abnormalities (e.g., P mitrale)
- Prolonged QTc interval [34]
Additional assessment [1][2]
Clinical composite scores
- Framingham heart failure diagnostic criteria may be used to rule in HF.
-
H2FPEF score
- Use: estimates the likelihood of HF in symptomatic patients with preserved ejection fraction on echocardiogram
- Variables
- High BMI: > 30 kg/m2 (2 points)
- Hypertension treated with ≥ 2 medications (1 point)
- Atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal or persistent) (3 points)
- PA systolic pressure > 35 mm Hg on echocardiogram (1 point)
- Elder age: > 60 years (1 point)
- Filling pressure elevated on echocardiogram: E/e′ ratio > 9 (1 point)
- Interpretation
- Score 0–1: HFpEF is ruled out.
- Score 2–5: Further diagnostic workup is needed.
- Score 6–9: HFpEF is ruled in.
Advanced studies
The following studies may be ordered by a specialist if there is diagnostic uncertainty and/or to evaluate for underlying causes.
- Cardiac MRI: highly accurate assessment of ventricular volume, mass, and ejection fraction [1]
- Noninvasive stress imaging, i.e., echocardiography, nuclear scintigraphy: to assess for obstructive CAD and myocardial ischemia [1]
-
Right heart catheterization (RHC)
- Most sensitive and specific study for HFpEF confirmation, but expensive and invasive [21]
- Used to assess right heart function and pulmonary vascular resistance in patients being considered for mechanical circulatory support or heart transplant
- May be considered for monitoring and guiding management in certain patients with cardiogenic shock. SvO2 is low in decompensated HF. [1]
-
Endomyocardial biopsy
- Ongoing diagnostic uncertainty and rapidly progressive disease
- Suspected infiltrative heart disease [1]
Identifying the specific cause of HF is crucial because it allows for tailored treatment in addition to GDMT. [1]
This calculator is provided by the third-party QXMD, who is solely responsible for its content and functionality.
Created by: QxMD.
Short video of a subxiphoid ultrasound examination of the heart (a marker indicates the probe position) showing a pericardial effusion
The right atrium (yellow overlay) is seen in the center of the image. The visceral pericardium (epicardium; red line) is clearly separated from the parietal and fibrous pericardium (green line) by a hypoechoic area (blue overlay), which corresponds to a pericardial effusion.
Our great thanks to sono.gallery, a medical ultrasound library by Dr. Daniel Merkel, for providing the images and videos.
Short video of an ultrasound examination of the lower left hemithorax (a marker indicates the probe position) showing pleural effusion
An anechoic pleural effusion (blue overlay) is visible in the costodiaphragmatic recess (costophrenic sulcus) near the middle of the video. On the left side of the video, aerated lung is visible. Since ultrasound waves are not transmitted through normal aerated lung, the lung is recognized by to and fro movement of the hyperechoic pleural line (green overlay) during respiration and the presence of horizontal lines (A-lines; reverberation artifact; yellow overlay) deep to the pleural line.
A pleural effusion (collection of fluid in the pleural space between the lungs and the chest wall) is a pathological finding.
Our great thanks to sono.gallery, a medical ultrasound library by Dr. Daniel Merkel, for providing the images and videos.
X-ray chest (PA view)
The cardiac silhouette is enlarged, with the left heart border displaced laterally (green overlay) from its normal position (green outline) as a result of left ventricular enlargement.
Source: © IMPP
X-ray chest (lateral view)
The prominent convexity of the posterior border of the cardiac silhouette (green overlay; normal cardiac silhouette indicated by green outline) represents left ventricular (LV) enlargement (indicated by arrow). There is no obliteration of the retrosternal space (red overlay) to indicate right ventricular (RV) enlargement.
Source: © IMPP
X-ray chest (AP view; erect) of a patient with cardiogenic pulmonary edema
Enlargement of the cardiac silhouette is accompanied by widening of the vascular pedicle. There is extensive parenchymal interstitial (examples indicated by arrowheads) and air-space edema. Air-space edema is most pronounced in the lower lung zones (green circles).
Vascular pedicle width (VPW; cf. illustration): distance between a vertical line drawn from the point at which the superior vena cava intersects the right main bronchus and a second vertical line drawn through the origin of the left subclavian artery. The VPW (white lines) is normal or narrowed in capillary permeability edema, normal in acute heart failure, and widened in chronic heart failure, fluid overload, and renal failure.
Source: “PulmEdema” by James Heilmann, MD, Wikimedia Commons, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0. Modifications: arrow and circle removed, "sitting" moved to the left. The supplementary image with overlays of relevant areas was adapted from the image mentioned above and licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
X-ray chest (AP view)
The cardiac silhouette is enlarged (hatched green overlay) and the perihilar air space opacities (green overlay) have a bat wing, or butterfly, configuration. Linear interstitial opacities representing Kerley A lines (orange dashed lines) radiate from the hila to the apices and Kerley B lines (white dashed lines) are seen in the lateral mid zones. The costophrenic angles are blunted (arrows) from bilateral pleural effusions.
These features are characteristically seen in cardiogenic pulmonary edema.
Our great thanks to Dr. Kissig (Center for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hedwigshöhe, St. Hedwig, Berlin, and St. Josefs Hospital, Potsdam) for kindly providing this image.
Chest x-ray (lateral view)
A thickened pericardial contour is visible from the apex to the upper cranial half of the heart, indicating fibrosis of the outer layer of the heart (green overlay).
Additional findings include a wedge-shaped, extensive opacity in the basal portion of the left lung, consistent with pleural effusion (green hatched overlay) and increased perihilar lung markings (red overlay), consistent with pulmonary congestion.
Source: © IMPP
12-lead ECG (paper speed: 25 mm/s)
– Heart rate: ∼55/min
– Regular sinus rhythm
– Normal cardiac axis: positive (+) QRS complex polarity in leads I, II, and III
– Broad and bifid P waves (P): referred to as “P mitrale” and suggestive of left atrial enlargement
– SV2 (S) + RV5 (R) >3.5 mV: meets Sokolow-Lyon criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy
– Left ventricular strain pattern: ST depression (ST) with T-wave inversion (T) in left-sided leads I and V4–V6
Positive Sokolow-Lyon criteria and left ventricular strain pattern are characteristic of left ventricular hypertrophy.
Source: © IMPP
Changes of right-heart strain with right axis deviation and right ventricular hypertrophy
© Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. AMBOSS SE, exclusive licensee.
Pathology
Sputum analysis in patients with pulmonary edema may show heart failure cells (hemosiderin-containing cells).
Photomicrograph of lung tissue (H&E stain; high magnification)
Accumulations of hemosiderin-laden macrophages, known as siderophages (examples indicated by blue overlay), are visible within alveoli. Additionally, alveoli filled with erythrocytes (examples indicated by yellow overlay) can be seen.
Siderophages in pulmonary alveoli (heart failure cells) suggest decompensated heart failure.
Source: © IMPP
Photomicrograph of lung tissue (H&E stain; 400x magnification)
There is accumulation of fluid in the alveoli in the center (green overlay). On the left, there are normal alveoli filled with air (black dashed outlines).
The finding of fluid-filled lung alveoli is consistent with pulmonary alveolar edema.
Click on the Smartzoom button to view the entire specimen through a virtual microscope.
Source: © Smart Zoom, Smart In Media. Image and annotations in digital microscopy: PD Dr. med. Alberto Perez Bouza, Facharzt für Pathologie
Differential diagnoses
See also “Differential diagnosis of dyspnea” and “Differential diagnosis of peripheral edema.”
-
Cardiovascular
- Cardiomyopathy
- CAD
- Valvular heart disease
- Pericardial disease: e.g., constrictive pericarditis, pericardial effusion
- Arrhythmia
- Chronic venous insufficiency
-
Pulmonary
- Obstructive lung disease: e.g., COPD, asthma
- Restrictive lung disease: e.g., ILD
- Pleural disease: e.g., pneumothorax, pleural effusion
- Pulmonary embolism
-
Other causes of dyspnea and/or edema
- Anemia
- Obesity
- Deconditioning
- Anxiety
- Cirrhosis
- Kidney failure, nephrotic syndrome
- Adverse effects of medications, e.g., calcium channel blockers, NSAIDs, glucocorticoids
- Lymphedema
- Neuromuscular disease: e.g., myasthenia gravis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
The differential diagnoses listed here are not exhaustive.
Management
Management of AHF is detailed in “Acute HF.”
Approach [1][2][35]
- Counsel on nonpharmacological interventions and self-care.
- Manage comorbidities and precipitating factors.
- Start pharmacotherapy for HF based on HF staging and LVEF, and monitor at each patient visit to optimize GDMT.
- Consider indications for referral to a cardiologist, e.g.:
- New-onset HF
- Clinical suspicion for HFpEF mimics
Multidisciplinary management of HF that includes nurses, cardiologists, and clinical pharmacists is associated with lower hospitalization and mortality rates. [1][2]
Nonpharmacological interventions [1][21]
Encourage and/or provide the following in combination with pharmacotherapy for HF.
-
Lifestyle modifications
- Aerobic exercise, e.g., brisk walking for ≥ 150 minutes/week [1][2][36]
- Weight loss [36]
-
Nutrition and fluid management
- Encourage healthy eating patterns, e.g., DASH diet, Mediterranean diet.
- Avoid excessive dietary sodium intake to reduce the risk of congestion. [1]
- Fluid restriction does not reduce hospitalization or mortality rates in patients with HF. [1]
- Smoking cessation, avoidance of alcohol and recreational drug use [1]
-
Patient self-care
- Daily self-monitoring
- Weight: Patients with significant weight changes (e.g., > 2 kg in 3 days) should seek medical advice. [2][12]
- Home blood pressure monitoring [2]
- HF symptoms, e.g., persistent or increasing dyspnea and/or edema
- Weight-based diuretic dose adjustment [1]
- Monitoring of medication side effects
- Daily self-monitoring
-
Other interventions [1]
- Vaccinations: pneumococcal vaccine, seasonal influenza vaccine, COVID-19 vaccine [1]
- Identification of factors associated with poor self-care, e.g.: [1]
- Frailty assessment
- Screening for depression
- Assessing for symptoms of cognitive impairment
- Assessment of social situation for older adults
- Cardiac rehabilitation [1]
Nonpharmacological interventions are associated with better patient outcomes, e.g., decreased rates of hospitalization and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. [1]
Management of comorbidities [1][2][35]
The following recommendations are specific to comorbidities in HF. Treat other comorbidities (e.g., lipid disorders, ASCVD, atrial fibrillation) as recommended by guidelines.
- Hypertension: treatment target of < 130/80 mm Hg [1][2][37]
- Diabetes mellitus: SGLT2is are recommended for all patients.
-
Iron deficiency: Parenteral iron therapy is recommended for patients with symptomatic HFrEF or HFmrEF. [1][38]
- Initial dosing is based on hemoglobin levels:
- Hgb ≤ 14 g/dL: ferric carboxymaltose
- Hgb 14–14.9 g/dL: ferric carboxymaltose
- Subsequent doses are based on patient weight and hemoglobin and ferritin levels.
- Initial dosing is based on hemoglobin levels:
-
Obesity [36]
- Consider using anthropometric data (e.g., waist circumference) to assess patients with BMI < 35 kg/m².
- Consider GLP-1 agonists for patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF to improve symptoms and functional capacity.
- Semaglutide for EF ≥ 45% [36][39]
- Tirzepatide (off-label) for EF ≥ 50% [40][36]
- Consider metabolic and bariatric surgery for patients with HF and obesity to reduce the risk of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality.
- Obstructive sleep apnea: Consider nocturnal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. [1]
Individuals with obesity have lower BNP and NT-pro BNP levels; consider a lower BNP threshold for diagnosis and monitoring of HF in patients with obesity. [36]
Monitoring [1][2]
To optimize GDMT, the following factors should be assessed at each patient visit.
- Clinical status
- Signs and symptoms of pulmonary congestion and/or leg edema
- Tolerance of physical activity
- Unexplained change in clinical status: Repeat TTE.
- Causes of clinical deterioration
- Concurrent illness, e.g., infection, MI
- Nonadherence to pharmacotherapy or nutritional recommendations
- Adverse effects and intolerance to pharmacotherapy, e.g.:
- Hypotension, dizziness, and/or cough: ARNIs, ARBs, ISDN with hydralazine
- Bradycardia: beta blockers, ivabradine
- Mycotic genital infections: SGLT2is
-
BMP to assess for:
-
Electrolyte derangements
- Hyperkalemia in patients on RAAS inhibitors, SGLT2is, and/or aldosterone antagonists [1]
- Hypokalemia in patients on diuretics
- Kidney function in patients on RAAS inhibitors, SGLT2is, and/or digoxin
-
Electrolyte derangements
Indications for referral [35]
The following are guideline-based indications for referral to a cardiologist:
- New-onset HF
- ≥ 1 high-risk features of chronic HF
- LVEF ≤ 35% for ≥ 3 months despite treatment with GDMT [35]
- The patient or clinician would like a second opinion on the etiology of HF and possible targeted therapies, e.g., revascularization
- Consideration for enrollment in a clinical trial
- Advanced HF therapies, e.g., device therapy for HF [1]
- Clinical suspicion for HFpEF mimics, e.g.: [2]
- Valvular disease
- HCM
- Familial amyloid cardiomyopathy
- Pericardial disease
- Cardiac sarcoidosis
- Myocarditis
Pharmacotherapy
General principles [1][2][35]
- Titrate medications to the target dosage, even if symptoms improve at lower doses.
- Dosages may be adjusted as frequently as every 1–2 weeks. [1]
- Most patients with HFimpEF should continue treatment, even if asymptomatic, to prevent relapse and worsening LV dysfunction. [1]
- Patients with HFmrEF may benefit from the agents recommended for HFrEF, especially SGLT2is. [1][41]
- Diuretics are recommended for all patients with congestion regardless of LVEF.
- Avoid prescribing drugs that may worsen HF.
- See “Use of heart failure medications in pregnancy and lactation” for modifications.
Pharmacotherapy for HFrEF [1][3][35]
-
ACC/AHA stage B: The goal of pharmacotherapy in these patients is to prevent symptomatic HF.
- Beta blocker
- PLUS either an ACEI or ARB
-
ACC/AHA stages C and D: The goal of pharmacotherapy in these patients is to reduce morbidity, mortality, and hospitalizations.
- One agent from each of the following drug classes, unless contraindicated (e.g., prior hypersensitivity reaction):
- Diuretics
- RAAS inhibitors
- Beta blockers
- SGLT2 inhibitors
- Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists
- Consider additional pharmacotherapy for refractory symptoms.
- One agent from each of the following drug classes, unless contraindicated (e.g., prior hypersensitivity reaction):
| Initial pharmacotherapy for HFrEF [1][3][35] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class | Indications | Recommended agents | ||||
| Diuretics | Loop diuretics |
|
|
|||
| Thiazide diuretics |
|
|
||||
| RAAS inhibitors | Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) |
|
|
|||
| ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) |
|
|
||||
| Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) |
|
|
||||
| Beta blockers |
|
|
||||
| SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) |
|
|
||||
| Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) |
|
|
||||
Drugs that improve prognosis (i.e., reduce morbidity, mortality, and hospitalization rates) are beta blockers, ACEIs, ARNIs, MRAs, hydralazine with isosorbide dinitrate, and SGLT2is.
| Additional pharmacotherapy for HFrEF [1][3] | ||
|---|---|---|
| Class | Indications | Recommended agents |
| Isosorbide dinitrate with hydralazine |
|
|
| If channel inhibitor |
|
|
| Digoxin |
|
|
| Soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator |
|
|
| Omega-3 fatty acid |
|
|
Diuretics and digoxin improve symptoms and significantly reduce the number of hospitalizations.
Pharmacotherapy for HFpEF [2][3][21]
- SGLT2i for all patients: e.g., dapagliflozin or empagliflozin [2][38]
- Loop diuretic for patients with congestion: e.g., furosemide or torsemide
- MRA, e.g., spironolactone (off-label) [2]
- ARNI, i.e., sacubitril/valsartan (preferred) or ARB (if ARNI is contraindicated or not available), e.g., candesartan [2]
Some agents used in GDMT for HFrEF (e.g., beta blockers, ACE inhibitors) lack evidence for benefit in most patients with HFpEF.
Drugs that may worsen HF [1]
The following drugs should be avoided or used with caution in patients with HF.
- Nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers: associated with higher HF rate of recurrence
- NSAIDs: can worsen HF symptoms
- Thiazolidinediones (e.g., pioglitazone): increased risk of congestion and hospitalization
- Antidepressants (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants): Consider interactions with HF pharmacotherapy. [43]
- Inhalation anesthetics: may induce myocardial depression and peripheral vasodilation, and decrease sympathetic activity
- Class IC and class III antiarrhythmic drugs: increased mortality
- DPP-4 inhibitors (e.g., saxagliptin, alogliptin): increased risk of hospitalization for HF
© AMBOSS
Device therapy and advanced HF management
Device therapy in HF
Automated implantable cardioverter defibrillators (AICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (CRTs) are beneficial in select patients with HF who are at risk for sudden cardiac death from ventricular tachyarrhythmias and who have worsening HF from cardiac dyssynchrony. [1][44]
AICDs in heart failure [1]
For more information, see “AICDs.”
- Goal: prevention of sudden cardiac death from tachyarrhythmias caused by cardiomyopathy
-
Indications
-
HFrEF patients with an expected survival of > 1 year and on GDMT with either:
- Nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or ischemic heart disease; at least 40 days post-MI with LVEF ≤ 35% and NYHA class II–III
- Ischemic heart disease; at least 40 days post-MI with LVEF ≤ 30% and NYHA class I
- Any other indication for AICDs
-
HFrEF patients with an expected survival of > 1 year and on GDMT with either:
CRT in heart failure [1]
For more information, see “CRTs.”
-
Goal consists of synchronizing contractions of the right and left ventricles, resulting in:
- Improved ventricular function [45][46]
- Reverse ventricular remodeling
- Reduction in secondary mitral regurgitation
-
Indications: The following criteria apply to patients with stage C HFrEF on optimized medical therapy and an expected survival of > 1 year.
-
LVEF ≤ 35% with NYHA class II–IV symptoms and sinus rhythm OR select patients with AFib PLUS:
- QRS duration of > 150 ms with or without LBBB pattern
- OR QRS duration of 120–149 ms with LBBB pattern
- LVEF ≤ 35% requiring pacing for other purposes, e.g., replacement of existing PPM
- LVEF 36–50% with high-risk AV block
-
LVEF ≤ 35% with NYHA class II–IV symptoms and sinus rhythm OR select patients with AFib PLUS:
Consider CRT-D in patients with indications for both CRT and AICD.
Advanced heart failure management (ACC/AHA stage D) [1][3]
Promptly refer all patients with advanced HF to an HF specialist for management.
-
Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) [1]
- May be short-term (days to weeks) or long-term (months to years)
- Short-term devices include intra-aortic balloon pump and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
- Long-term devices include ventricular assist devices, e.g., LV assist device. [47]
-
IV inotropic support: e.g., adrenergic agonists, PDE3 inhibitors, vasopressors [1]
- May be used as a bridging measure for patients awaiting MCS or heart transplant
- In rare cases, may be used for palliative symptom control
- See also “Management of cardiogenic shock.”
-
Heart transplant [1]
- Heart transplant is the only cure for advanced HF.
- Recommended for patients with advanced HF despite optimal pharmacological, device, and surgical therapy
- Bridging measures, e.g., IV inotropic support and MCS, are usually required.
- Palliative care: Refer patients who are not candidates for transplant.
Pacemaker systems consist of a pulse generator, which is usually implanted superficial to the pectoral muscle in the infraclavicular region, and leads (usually transvenous), which deliver pacing impulses to the heart.
Biventricular pacemakers have a lead in the right atrium, the right ventricle, and the coronary sinus (to pace the left ventricle).
© AMBOSS
X-ray chest (AP; frontal view)
The cardiac silhouette is enlarged. A generator projects over the upper left hemithorax. Right (green line) and left (yellow line) ventricular leads and a right atrial lead (red line) are visible. The left ventricular lead traverses the coronary sinus. ECG electrodes and leads are also present (dashed lines).
This image demonstrates cardiac resynchronization therapy with a biventricular pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator. The thickened coil of the right ventricular lead indicates that the pacemaker is combined with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
Source: “Fig. 3, in: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Cardiogenic Shock: A Case-Based Discussion” by Somoza-Cano F J, Toledo J F, Amaya-Handal R, Al Armashi A R, Somoza F R, Cureus, licensed under CC BY 4.0. Modifications: Image was cropped. The supplementary image with overlays of relevant areas was adapted from the image mentioned above (© AMBOSS).
Illustration of peripheral cannulation using the femoral vein and femoral artery; other access techniques may be used
Deoxygenated blood is removed from the right atrium and returned to the descending aorta after oxygenation in a retrograde direction. If the heart is not beating and there is no residual cardiac output, this retrograde flow will reach as far back as the closed aortic valve, and the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) system will provide all of the patient's circulation. If there is remaining physiological output from the left ventricle, the two flows meet and create a “mixing cloud” of poorly oxygenated blood from the native circulation and well-oxygenated blood from the ECMO circuit.
The mixing cloud depicted here is in the aortic arch (where red and blue arrows meet). It may, however, be located anywhere between the aortic valve and the ECMO cannula tip and shift depending on changes in left ventricular output and ECMO blood flow. The location of the mixing cloud influences the oxygen content of the blood reaching the various aortic branches. In this example, while the renal arteries receive well-oxygenated blood from the ECMO circuit (red arrows), the carotid and subclavian arteries receive more poorly oxygenated blood from the mixing cloud (purple arrows).
© AMBOSS
Complications
- Acute decompensated heart failure (see “Acute heart failure”)
- Cardiorenal syndrome
- Cardiac arrhythmias
- Central sleep apnea
- Cardiogenic shock
- Stroke: due to increased risk of arterial thromboembolisms (especially with concurrent atrial fibrillation)
- Chronic kidney disease
-
Cardiac cirrhosis
- A complication of right-sided heart failure characterized by cirrhosis due to chronic hepatic vein congestion.
- Associated with "nutmeg liver" (diffuse mottling on imaging due to ischemia and fatty degeneration).
- Venous stasis, leg ulcers
We list the most important complications. The selection is not exhaustive.
Cardiorenal syndrome
- Definition: a complex syndrome in which renal function progressively declines as a result of severe cardiac dysfunction [48]
- Epidemiology: occurs in ∼ 30% of patients with acute decompensated heart failure
-
AHA classification [49]
- Type 1: acute cardiorenal syndrome (most common subtype)
- Heart failure leading to acute kidney injury
- Examples: acute coronary syndrome and/or acute heart failure resulting in acute kidney injury
- Type 2: chronic cardiorenal syndrome
- Chronic heart failure leading to chronic kidney disease
- Example: chronic heart failure resulting in the new onset or progression of chronic kidney disease
- Type 3: acute renocardiac syndrome
- Acute kidney injury leading to acute heart failure
- Example: heart failure resulting from acute kidney injury due to volume overload
- Type 4: chronic renocardiac syndrome
- Chronic kidney disease leading to chronic heart failure
- Example: LV hypertrophy resulting from chronic kidney disease-associated cardiomyopathy
- Type 5: secondary cardiorenal syndrome
- Systemic disease leading to kidney and heart failure
- Examples: cirrhosis, amyloidosis
- Type 1: acute cardiorenal syndrome (most common subtype)
-
Pathophysiology
- Systolic dysfunction → ↓ cardiac output → renal hypoperfusion → prerenal kidney failure
- Diastolic dysfunction → systemic venous congestion → renal venous congestion → ↓ transglomerular pressure gradient → ↓ GFR → ↓ kidney function
- RAAS activation → salt and fluid retention → hypertension → hypertensive nephropathy
- Diagnostics: ↓ GFR, ↑ creatinine that cannot be explained by underlying kidney disease
- Treatment: heart failure and renal failure management (see “Acute renal injury”)
- Prognosis: CHF with reduced GFR and high creatinine levels (> 3 mg/dL) is associated with a poor prognosis. [50]
Prognosis
The prognosis depends on the patient, type and severity of heart disease, and adherence to GDMT and nonpharmacological interventions. Risk stratification scales may be used to determine prognosis (e.g., CHARM and CORONA risk scores).
-
Factors associated with worse prognosis
- Signs of congestion, e.g., edema, S3 heart sound, lung rales [12]
- Persistently elevated BNP and/or NT-pro BNP [1][21][22]
- Hyponatremia
- Systolic BP < 120 mm Hg [1]
- Chronic comorbidities, e.g., diabetes mellitus, anemia, obesity [2]
- Unintentional weight loss or underweight [36]
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator use
-
High-risk features of chronic HF [35]
- Reliance on IV inotropic support, e.g., PDE3 inhibitors
- Persistent NYHA class III-IV symptoms
- Symptomatic hypotension or systolic BP ≤ 90 mm Hg
- Creatinine ≥ 1.8 mg/dL or BUN ≥ 43 mg/dL
- Ventricular arrhythmias, repetitive ICD shocks, atrial fibrillation
- ≥ 2 ED visits or hospitalizations for HF exacerbation within the last 12 months
- Intolerance of target dosing for beta-blockers, RAAS inhibitors, and/or mineralocorticoid antagonists
- Clinical deterioration marked by any of the following:
- Worsening symptoms, edema, and/or performance on exercise testing
- Rising cardiac biomarkers, e.g., BNP
- Acute decompensated HF
- Imaging findings of progressive cardiac remodeling
- High projected mortality risk using a validated risk model, e.g., Seattle Heart Failure Model
-
1-year survival according to NYHA stage
- Stage I: ∼ 95%
- Stage II: ∼ 85%
- Stage III: ∼ 85%
- Stage IV: ∼ 35%
This calculator is provided by the third-party QXMD, who is solely responsible for its content and functionality.
Created by: QxMD.
Related One-Minute Telegram
- One-Minute Telegram 90-2024-1/3: A new tool for PREVENTing CVD
- One-Minute Telegram 84-2023-3/3: A STEP in the right direction for obesity-related HFpEF
- One-Minute Telegram 74-2023-3/3: A guide for heart failure guidelines
- One-Minute Telegram 68-2023-2/3: Loop me in: torsemide or furosemide for heart failure?
- One-Minute Telegram 10-2020-2/3: Positive effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure regardless of diabetes status
- One-Minute Telegram 8-2020-3/3: For some patients with heart failure, more pills mean better outcomes, study finds
Interested in the newest medical research, distilled down to just one minute? Sign up for the One-Minute Telegram in “Tips and links” below.
External Resources
- One-Minute Telegram
- 2024 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Treatment of HFrEF
- 2023 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
- 2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure
- 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines
- 2021 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure
References
- "Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association"
- Lewsey SC, Breathett K. "Racial and ethnic disparities in heart failure: current state and future directions". Curr Opin Cardiol. 36(3). :320-328. (2021)
- Díez-Villanueva P, Jiménez-Méndez C, Alfonso F. "Heart failure in the elderly.". JGC. 18(3). :219-232. (2021)
- Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines". Circulation. 145(18). (2022)
- Murphy SP, Ibrahim NE, Januzzi JL. "Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction". JAMA. 324(5). :488. (2020)
- Ritchie R, Abel E. "Basic Mechanisms of Diabetic Heart Disease". Circ Res. 126(11). :1501-1525. (2020)
- Silverberg D, Wexler D, Blum M, Schwartz D, Iaina A. "The association between congestive heart failure and chronic renal disease". Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 13(2). :163-170. (2004)
- Kittleson MM, Panjrath GS, Amancherla K, et al. "2023 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction". J Am Coll Cardiol. 81(18). :1835-1878. (2023)
- "Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations. 3rd edition. Chapter 183: Nocturia". https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK293/
- Okoshi MP, Capalbo RV, Romeiro FG, Okoshi K. "Cardiac Cachexia: Perspectives for Prevention and Treatment". Arq Bras Cardiol. (2016)
- Kasper DL, Fauci AS, Hauser S, et al. "Harrisons Principles of Internal Medicine ". McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division. 19. (2016). ISBN: 9780071802154
- Colucci WS. "Evaluation of the patient with suspected heart failure". UpToDate. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/evaluation-of-the-patient-with-suspected-heart-failure?source=search_result&search=congestive%20heart%20failure%20diagnosis&selectedTitle=1~150. [2015-10-19]
- Redfield MM, Borlaug BA. "Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction". JAMA. 329(10). :827. (2023)
- Tsutsui H, ALBERT NM, COATS AJS, et al. "Natriuretic Peptides: Role in the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America and Japanese Heart Failure Society". J Card Fail. 29(5). :787-804. (2023)
- Filippatos TD. "Hyponatremia in patients with heart failure". World J Cardiol. 5(9). :317. (2013)
- Anand IS, Gupta P. "Anemia and Iron Deficiency in Heart Failure". Circulation. 138(1). :80-98. (2018)
- Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. "2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America". Circulation. 136(6). (2017)
- Hudson MP, O’Connor CM, Gattis WA, et al. "Implications of elevated cardiac troponin t in ambulatory patients with heart failure: a prospective analysis". Am Heart J. 147(3). :546-552. (2004)
- Wettersten N, Maisel A. "Role of Cardiac Troponin Levels in Acute Heart Failure". Card Fail Rev. 1(2). :102. (2015)
- Omar AMS, Bansal M, Sengupta PP. "Advances in Echocardiographic Imaging in Heart Failure With Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction". Circ Res. 119(2). :357-374. (2016)
- Natanzon A, Kronzon I. "Pericardial and Pleural Effusions in Congestive Heart Failure—Anatomical, Pathophysiologic, and Clinical Considerations". Am J Med Sci. 338(3). :211-216. (2009)
- Petrie MC, McMurray JJV. "It cannot be cardiac failure because the heart is not enlarged on the chest X-ray". Eur J Heart Fail. 5(2). :117-119. (2003)
- Zipes DP. "Braunwald's Heart Disease". Mosby. (2018). ISBN: 9780323463423
- Gouda P, Brown P, Rowe BH, McAlister FA, Ezekowitz JA. "Insights into the importance of the electrocardiogram in patients with acute heart failure". Eur J Heart Fail. 18(8). :1032-1040. (2016)
- O’Neal WT, Mazur M, Bertoni AG, et al. "Electrocardiographic Predictors of Heart Failure With Reduced Versus Preserved Ejection Fraction: The Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis". Journal of the American Heart Association. 6(6). (2017)
- Davey PP, Barlow C, Hart G. "Prolongation of the QT interval in heart failure occurs at low but not at high heart rates.". Clin Sci (Lond). 98(5). :603-10. (2000)
- Kittleson MM, Benjamin EJ, Blumer V, et al. "2025 ACC Scientific Statement on the Management of Obesity in Adults With Heart Failure". J Am Coll Cardiol. (2025)
- Maddox TM, Januzzi JL, Allen LA, et al. "2024 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction". J Am Coll Cardiol. (2024)
- Givertz MM, Haghighat A. "High-output heart failure". UpToDate. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/high-output-heart-failure. [2016-08-09]
- Editors: Donald W Kufe, MD, Raphael E Pollock, et al. "Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine". BC Decker. (2003). ISBN: 1550092138
- Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Claggett B, et al. "Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction". N Engl J Med. 387(12). :1089-1098. (2022)
- McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. "2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure". Eur Heart J. 42(36). :3599-3726. (2021)
- "Diagnosis of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Reproductive-Aged Women". https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-bulletin/articles/2012/07/diagnosis-of-abnormal-uterine-bleeding-in-reproductive-aged-women. [2012-07-01]
- McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. "2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure". Eur Heart J. (2023)
- Guck TP, Elsasser GN, Kavan MG, Eugene J. EJ. "Depression and Congestive Heart Failure". Congest Heart Fail. 9(3). :163-169. (2003)
- Mehra MR, Park MH, Landzberg MJ, Lala A, Waxman AB. "Right Heart Failure: Toward a Common Language". Pulm Circ. 3(4). :963-967. (2013)
- Kurmani S, Squire I. "Acute Heart Failure: Definition, Classification and Epidemiology". Curr Heart Fail Rep. 14(5). :385-392. (2017)
- Federmann M, Hess OM. "Differentiation between Systolic and Diastolic Dysfunction". Eur Heart J. 15(suppl D). :2-6. (1994)
- Borlaug BA, Redfield MM. "Diastolic and Systolic Heart Failure Are Distinct Phenotypes Within the Heart Failure Spectrum". Circulation. 123(18). :2006-2014. (2011)
- Loscalzo J, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, et al. "Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, Twenty-First Edition (Vol.1 & Vol.2)". McGraw-Hill Education / Medical. (2022). ISBN: 9781264268504
- Aronson D. "Cardiorenal syndrome in acute decompensated heart failure". Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 10(2). :177-189. (2014)
- Rangaswami J, Bhalla V, Blair JEA, et al. "Cardiorenal Syndrome: Classification, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment Strategies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association". Circulation. 139(16). (2019)
- Mahon NG, Blackstone EH, Francis GS, et al. "The prognostic value of estimated creatinine clearance alongside functional capacity in ambulatory patients with chronic congestive heart failure". J Am Coll Cardiol. 40(6). :1106-1113. (2002)
- Whelton, PK, Carey, RM et al. "2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults". Hypertension. 71(6). :e13–e115. (2017)
- Kosiborod MN, Abildstrøm SZ, Borlaug BA, et al. "Semaglutide in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Obesity". N Engl J Med. (2023)
- Packer M, Zile M, Kramer C, et al. "Tirzepatide for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Obesity". New Engl J Med. 392(5). :427-437. (2025)
- Leyva F, Zegard A, Acquaye E, et al. "Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With or Without Defibrillation in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy". J Am Coll Cardiol. 70(10). :1216-1227. (2017)
- Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure". J Am Coll Cardiol. 62(16). :e147-e239. (2013)
- Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P et al. "2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy". Eur Heart J. 34(29). :2281-2329. (2013)
- "Mechanical Circulatory Support in a Nutshell". https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2015/11/12/09/28/mechanical-circulatory-support-in-a-nutshell. [2015-11-13]
- Long B, Koyfman A, Gottlieb M. "Management of Heart Failure in the Emergency Department Setting: An Evidence-Based Review of the Literature". J Emerg Med. 55(5). :635-646. (2018)
- Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive Summary". J Am Coll Cardiol. 62(16). :1495-1539. (2013)
- Van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, et al. "Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association". Circulation. 136(16). (2017)
- Felker GM, Lee KL, Bull DA, et al. "Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure". N Engl J Med. 364(9). :797-805. (2011)
- Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, et al. "2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia". Circulation. 133(14). :e506–e574. (2016)
- January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation". J Am Coll Cardiol. 64(21). :e1-e76. (2014)
- Schünemann HJ, Cushman M, Burnett AE, et al. "American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients". Blood Advances. 2(22). :3198-3225. (2018)
- "Ivabradine". https://www.drugs.com/ppa/ivabradine.html. [2020-01-20]
- Morales-Rull JL, Bielsa S, Conde-Martel A, et al. "Pleural effusions in acute decompensated heart failure: Prevalence and prognostic implications". Eur J Intern Med. 52. :49-53. (2018)
- Mercer RM, Corcoran JP, Porcel JM, Rahman NM, Psallidas I. "Interpreting pleural fluid results". Clin Med (Northfield Il). 19(3). :213-217. (2019)