Summary

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the obstruction of one or more pulmonary arteries by an embolic solid, fluid, or gas. In the majority of cases, PE is caused by a venous thrombus that originated in the legs or pelvis and embolized to the lungs via the inferior vena cava. Risk factors include immobility, inherited hypercoagulability disorders, pregnancy, postpartum period, and recent surgery. The clinical presentation can range from asymptomatic to obstructive shock, depending on the extent of pulmonary artery obstruction. Because symptoms are often nonspecific (e.g., chest pain, coughing, shortness of breath, and tachycardia), PE should be considered in all patients with acute dyspnea. A tentative diagnosis of PE is usually based on history and clinical suspicion, then confirmed with CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). Arterial blood gas analysis (ABG) may be normal or show low partial oxygen pressure and respiratory alkalosis. Serum D-dimer test is highly sensitive for PE and can help rule out the diagnosis. Therapeutic anticoagulation is initiated to prevent further embolic events and to promote the gradual dissolution of the embolism and any underlying thrombosis. Treatment for massive PE with hemodynamic instability additionally involves restoring pulmonary perfusion with thrombolytic agents and/or embolectomy.

See also “Nonthrombotic embolism” and “Deep vein thrombosis.”

Definitions

  • Pulmonary embolism (PE): luminal obstruction of one or more pulmonary arteries, typically due to blood thrombi from deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
  • Venous thromboembolism (VTE): an umbrella term that encompasses PE and DVT (see also “Hypercoagulable states”)
    • Recurrent VTE: VTE that recurs in a patient after the completion of the first 2 weeks of antithrombotic therapy [1]
    • Provoked VTE: VTE in an individual with ≥ 1 risk factor for VTE
    • Unprovoked VTE (idiopathic VTE): VTE in an individual without risk factors for VTE

Epidemiology

  • Incidence [2]
    • ∼ 1–2 venous thromboembolism per 1,000 in the United States per year
    • Rises with age
  • Sex: overall ♂ > ♀ but women have a slight increase during the reproductive years [2]
  • Mortality: Venous thromboembolism accounts for ∼ 100,000 deaths in the US per year. [2]

Epidemiological data refers to the US, unless otherwise specified.

Etiology

  • Most common: : Deep vein thrombosis (See “Risk factors for VTE.”) [2]
  • Causes of nonthrombotic embolism
    • Fat embolism
    • Air embolism
    • Amniotic fluid embolism
    • Others: bacterial embolism, pulmonary tumor embolism, pulmonary cement embolism

PE is FATAL: PE caused by Fat, Air, Thrombus, Amniotic fluid, and Less common, i.e., bacterial, tumor, and cement.

Pathophysiology

  • Mechanism: thrombus formation (see “Virchow's triad.”) deep vein thrombosis in the legs or pelvis (most commonly iliac vein) embolization to pulmonary arteries via inferior vena cava; → partial or complete obstruction of pulmonary arteries [2]
  • Pathophysiologic response of the lung to arterial obstruction ; [2]
    • Infarction and inflammation of the lungs and pleura
      • Causes pleuritic chest pain and hemoptysis
      • Leads to surfactant dysfunction → atelectasis → PaO2 [3]
      • Triggers respiratory drive → hyperventilation and tachypnea → respiratory alkalosis with hypocapnia (PaCO2)
    • Impaired gas exchange
      • Mechanical vessel obstruction → ventilation-perfusion mismatch → arterial hypoxemia (PaO2) and elevated A-a gradient (See “Diagnostics” below.)
    • Cardiac compromise
      • Elevated pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) due to blockage → right ventricular pressure overload → forward failure with decreased cardiac output hypotension and tachycardia
  • Pulmonary vasoconstriction: thromboxane A2, prostaglandins, adenosine, thrombin, and serotonin secreted by activated platelet and the thrombus → pulmonary vasoconstriction and bronchospasm [4]
  • Saddle thrombus
    • A blood clot (e.g., from deep vein thrombosis) that lodges at the bifurcation of the pulmonary trunk as it splits into the right and left pulmonary arteries.
    • Can obstruct blood flow through the pulmonary arteries and lead to right heart strain, hemodynamic instability, and/or death.

Clinical features

  • Common features of PE ; [5]
    • Acute onset of symptoms
    • Dyspnea (> 75% of cases) [5]
    • Tachycardia and tachypnea (up to 50% of cases) [5]
    • Sudden pleuritic chest pain (∼ 20% of cases) [5]
    • Cough and hemoptysis
    • Associated features of DVT: e.g., unilaterally painful leg swelling [6]
  • Less common features of PE [5]
    • Decreased breath sounds
    • Dullness to percussion
    • Split S2
    • Low-grade fever
    • Rarely, upper abdominal pain [7][8]
  • Features of massive PE (e.g., due to a saddle thrombus)
    • Presyncope or syncope
    • Jugular venous distension; and Kussmaul sign
    • Hypotension and obstructive shock
    • Circulatory collapse
  • Features of intraoperative PE: all features typically have an abrupt onset [9][10]
    • Decrease in EtCO2 (early sign)
    • Decrease in SpO2
    • Hypotension
    • Tachycardia

Most patients with PE have a grossly normal physical examination; abnormalities heard on lung auscultation (e.g., wheezes or bilateral rales) often suggest a different cause for the symptoms. [5]

Consider PE as a differential diagnosis in recurring or progressive dyspnea of uncertain etiology.

Pretest probability of pulmonary embolism

Overview [11][12]

Estimate pretest probability (PTP) using validated tools and/or clinician gestalt to guide diagnostic testing. [11][12][13]

  • High PTP of PE
    • Modified Wells score > 4
    • Original Wells score ≥ 7
    • Revised Geneva score > 10
  • Intermediate PTP of PE
    • Original Wells score 2–6
    • Revised Geneva score 4–10
  • Low PTP of PE
    • Modified Wells score ≤ 4
    • Original Wells score < 2
    • Revised Geneva score < 4
  • Very low PTP of PE: Low PTP of PE plus PERC = 0

Wells criteria for pulmonary embolism [14]

The Wells score is a diagnostic algorithm for assessing the probability of PE and has been validated in inpatient and outpatient settings. Use “Wells criteria for DVT” to calculate the PTP of deep vein thrombosis.

Wells criteria for PE [15][16]
Criteria Points
Clinical symptoms of DVT 3
PE more likely than other diagnoses 3
Previous PE/DVT 1.5
Tachycardia (heart rate > 100/min) 1.5
Surgery or immobilization in the past 4 weeks 1.5
Hemoptysis 1
Malignancy 1
Original Wells score (clinical probability) [15]
  • Total score 0–1: low probability of PE (6%)
  • Total score 2–6: intermediate probability of PE (23%)
  • Total score ≥ 7: high probability of PE (49%)
Modified Wells score (simplified clinical probability) [16]
  • Total score ≤ 4: PE unlikely (8%)
  • Total score > 4: PE likely (34%)

Revised Geneva score [17]

The revised Geneva score utilizes objective clinical variables. It has been externally validated and was initially studied in emergency department outpatients.

Revised Geneva score [15]
Criteria Points
Age > 65 years 1
Prior history of DVT or PE 3
Recent surgery or fracture of the lower limbs 2
Personal history of cancer 2
Unilateral lower limb pain 3
Hemoptysis 2
Heart rate 75–94/min 3
Heart rate ≥ 95/min 5
Pain on palpation of lower limb and unilateral edema 4
Clinical pretest probability
  • Total score < 4: low probability of PE (9%)
  • Total score 4–10: intermediate probability of PE (26%)
  • Total score > 10: high probability of PE (76%)

Pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) [12][18][19]

Patients with a low PTP of PE and a PERC score of zero have a very low probability of PE and require no further testing. [20]

Pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC)
Criteria Points
Age > 50 years 1
Heart rate > 100/min 1
Oxygen saturation < 95% 1
Hemoptysis 1
Estrogen use 1
Prior history of DVT or PE 1
Recent surgery or trauma in the past 4 weeks 1
Unilateral lower limb edema 1
Clinical pretest probability
  • Total score 0: pretest probability < 1%; no further testing needed
  • Total score ≥ 1: PE is not ruled out; further testing needed

PERC should only be used in patients with a previously determined low PTP of PE.

The presence of any PERC criteria in a patient with suspected PE necessitates further testing.

Diagnosis

Approach [5][12][21]

  • Hemodynamically unstable patients: Begin management of massive PE prior to diagnostic confirmation. [22]
    • Assess for signs of RV dysfunction.
      • Obtain an ECG.
      • Perform a bedside echocardiogram or focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) [22][23]
    • Consider adding DVT point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). [24]
    • Obtain confirmatory imaging (CTPA or V/Q scan) when stable enough for transport.
  • Hemodynamically stable patients (e.g., systolic BP > 90 mm Hg): Assess PTP of PE.
    • Low PTP of PE
      • PERC = 0: No further testing for PE is required.
      • PERC > 0: Obtain D-dimer.
        • Elevated D-dimer: Obtain confirmatory imaging.
        • Normal D-dimer: No further testing for PE is required; consider alternative diagnoses.
    • Intermediate PTP of PE: Obtain D-dimer.
      • Elevated D-dimer: Obtain confirmatory imaging.
      • Normal D-dimer: No further testing for PE is required; consider alternative diagnoses.
    • High PTP of PE: Obtain confirmatory imaging.
  • Confirmed PE: Assess severity using ECG, cardiac biomarkers, and imaging (e.g., CTPA or echocardiography) [22][25]

Initial evaluation

The initial evaluation of patients with dyspnea and/or chest pain typically includes laboratory studies, CXR, and ECG. Findings may suggest but do not confirm PE. [5]

D-dimer [12][22]

  • Indications
    • Intermediate PTP of PE
    • Low PTP of PE and PERC > 0
  • Findings
    • Normal levels: < 500 ng/mL
    • If ≥ 500 ng/mL: Further testing is required (see below).
    • If the patient is > 50 years of age, adjust for age: age x 10 ng/mL = cutoff value in ng/mL [12][20][26]
  • Interpretation
    • High sensitivity and negative predictive value: A negative D-dimer test most likely rules out PE.
    • Low specificity: positive results in all forms of fibrinolysis

Normal D-dimer values usually rule out PE or DVT in patients with a low PTP. A positive D-dimer is nonspecific, since it may be elevated in any situation in which there is increased fibrinolysis.

Additional laboratory studies [12]

  • Arterial blood gas (ABG) [27][28]
    • Often normal
    • Common findings
      • Alveolar-arterial gradient
      • Hypoxemia (e.g., SaO2, PaO₂ < 80 mm Hg)
      • Respiratory alkalosis
  • CBC: may show leukocytosis [29]
  • BMP: used to assess renal function
  • Cardiac biomarkers: e.g., troponin, BNP, NT-proBNP (See “Severity assessment” for interpretation.)

A normal oxygen saturation and/or normal PaO2 do not rule out PE. [5][30]

Chest x-ray [23]

  • Characteristic findings
    • Hampton hump: a wedge-shaped opacity in the peripheral lung with its base at the thoracic wall; caused by pulmonary infarction and not specific for PE
    • Westermark sign: an area of lung parenchyma lucency caused by oligemia secondary to occlusion of blood flow
    • Fleischner sign: a prominent pulmonary artery caused by vessel distention due to a large pulmonary embolus (common in massive PE)
  • Nonspecific findings
    • Atelectasis
    • Pleural effusions
    • Cardiomegaly

Electrocardiography (ECG)

  • Most common findings [31]
    • T-wave inversions or flattening
    • Sinus tachycardia
    • Normal ECG
  • Predictors of adverse outcomes: See “High-risk ECG findings in PE.”
  • Other ECG findings in PE: sinus bradycardia (< 60/min); uncommon) [32]

Confirmatory imaging

CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) [12][23][33]

CTPA is the preferred test for the diagnosis of acute PE. [23]

  • Technique: CT chest with bolus IV contrast enhancement of the pulmonary arteries
  • Indications
    • All patients with a high PTP of PE
    • Elevated D-dimer in patients with a low or intermediate PTP of PE
  • Contraindications
    • Renal insufficiency
    • Contrast allergy
  • Findings
    • Direct finding of PE: intraluminal filling defects of pulmonary arteries
    • Pulmonary infarct: opacity with consolidated border; may be accompanied by pleural effusion
    • Evidence of RV dysfunction [34]

A wedge-shaped infarction with pleural effusion is almost pathognomonic for PE. [23]

Ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy (V/Q scan) [12][23]

  • Technique: comparison of perfusion and ventilation scintigraphy to identify ventilation-perfusion mismatch
  • Indication: alternative to CTPA in patients with contraindications for iodinated IV contrast
  • Findings [33][35]
    • The absence of perfusion in normally ventilated areas of the lung (mismatch) suggests PE.
    • Discordance between V/Q scan results and the clinical PTP necessitates further evaluation.

CTPA and V/Q scans have similar sensitivities and specificities for PE, but CTPA is faster and more readily available. [23]

Pulmonary angiography [23][33]

  • Technique: selective injection of contrast dye into the pulmonary arteries during fluoroscopic examination
  • Indications
    • Inconclusive CTPA findings and high level of suspicion for PE
    • Candidates for concomitant endovascular treatment, e.g., embolectomy
  • Findings: intraluminal filling defects in pulmonary arteries

Adjunctive imaging

  • Lower extremity venous ultrasound [12][21]
    • Indications
      • Symptoms of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
      • Contraindications to CTPA (e.g., contrast allergy and renal insufficiency)
      • Pregnancy
    • Findings: e.g., noncompressible deep vein (See “Ultrasound findings of DVT” for details.
      • High sensitivity for DVT but not for PE
      • A negative ultrasound does not rule out PE. [36][37]
  • POCUS in VTE [38][39][40]
    • Clinical applications
      • Supporting a clinical diagnosis of VTE in patients who cannot undergo prompt confirmatory imaging
      • Evaluating for alternative diagnoses
    • Techniques: See “Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS),” “POCUS for DVT” and “Lung POCUS.”
    • Findings
      • FoCUS: Signs of RV strain (e.g., D-sign, RV enlargement) may be present.
      • POCUS for DVT: Signs of an incompressible proximal deep vein may be present.
      • Lung POCUS: Signs of alternative diagnoses (e.g., pneumonia, pulmonary edema) may be present.
  • Magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography: if CTPA or V/Q scan cannot be performed [23][41]

The absence of a DVT does not rule out PE, but the presence of a DVT can justify starting empiric anticoagulation for PE. [38]

Severity assessment [22][42][43]

Signs of RV dysfunction that predict adverse outcomes (e.g., hemodynamic collapse or death) can be identified clinically, electrically, biochemically, and radiologically (e.g., on echocardiography or CTPA). [22][25][43]

ECG and cardiac biomarkers

  • High-risk ECG findings in PE [44][45]
    • Signs of right heart strain [5]
      • SIQIIITIII-pattern
      • New right bundle branch block (incomplete or complete)
      • T-wave inversion in anterior precordial leads (V1–V4)
    • Sinus tachycardia (> 100/min)
    • Atrial fibrillation
    • ST elevation in aVR
    • Q waves in III and aVF
  • Troponin: elevated if myocardial damage has occurred [22][46]
  • B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or NT-proBNP: identifies RV strain [22][47]

BNP is nonspecific but can predict early adverse outcomes in patients with PE. [22]

Echocardiography

  • Goal: mostly used for prognosis; can be used as a diagnostic tool in patients too unstable for confirmatory imaging
  • Indications
    • Suspected right-heart strain or RV dysfunction
    • Critically ill patients with suspected PE
  • Findings [22][23][43]
    • Dilatation and hypokinesis of the right ventricle (RV)
    • RV dysfunction
    • McConnell sign: akinesia of the mid-free RV wall and hypercontractility of the apical wall
    • Venous reflux with IVC dilation
    • Tricuspid regurgitation (tricuspid valve insufficiency)
    • PASP
    • Increased right atrial pressure

The presence or absence of RV dysfunction guides the risk stratification and subsequent management of hemodynamically stable patients with PE. [25][48]

Identification of underlying pathology

  • Evaluation for thrombophilia [49]
    • Indicated in younger patients with any of the following
      • No or weak risk factors
      • Family history
      • Recurrence of venous thrombosis
    • Timing: after the completion of therapy
    • See “Hypercoagulable states.”
  • Evaluation for malignancies: age-appropriate screening studies; See “Preventive Medicine.”

Pathology

  • Purpose: distinguishing cause of embolism (See “Etiology”.)
  • Histological findings [50]
    • Lines of Zahn: alternating layers of platelets mixed with fibrin (light pink layers) and red blood cells (dark red layers)
    • Only appear premortally (help distinguish a premortal thrombus from a postmortem one)

Differential diagnoses

  • See “Differential diagnosis of chest pain.”
  • See “Differential diagnosis of dyspnea.”
  • Other causes of obstructive shock, e.g., cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax
  • Postoperative atelectasis
  • Anxiety disorders

The differential diagnoses listed here are not exhaustive.

Classification

Classification by PE severity [51]

This system guides management using hemodynamic parameters and markers of RV dysfunction.

  • Nonmassive PE
    • Stable blood pressure (SBP > 90 mm Hg)
    • No RV dysfunction
    • Normal cardiac biomarkers
  • Submassive PE
    • Stable blood pressure (SBP > 90 mm Hg) PLUS ≥ 1 of the following:
      • RV dysfunction
      • Evidence of myocardial necrosis (elevated troponin)
  • Massive PE: hemodynamic instability (due to right heart failure)
    • Systolic BP < 90 mm Hg for > 15 minutes
    • Acute decrease in systolic BP ≥ 40 mm Hg
    • Hemodynamic support is needed.

Classification by overall PE prognosis [52][53]

This system guides disposition using prognostic risk stratification scores (e.g., PESI or sPESI).

  • Low-risk PE: PESI class I–II or sPESI score = 0
  • Intermediate-risk PE: PESI class III
  • High-risk PE: PESI class ≥ IV or sPESI score ≥ 1

Pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) and simplified PESI (sPESI) [52][53]

The PESI and sPESI stratify the 30-day risk of mortality or adverse outcomes based on patient demographics, comorbidities, and degree of clinical stability.

PESI and sPESI
Criteria Points
PESI [52] sPESI [53]
Age 1 per year 1 if > 80 years
History of cancer 30 1
Systolic blood pressure < 100 mm Hg 30 1
Heart rate ≥ 110/min 20 1
O2 saturation on room air < 90% 20 1
Heart failure 10 1
Chronic lung disease 10
Altered mental status 60 Not considered
Temperature < 37.0°C (< 98.6°F) 20
Respiratory rate ≥ 30/min 20
Sex Male: 10 Female: 0
PESI interpretation (30-day mortality rate, inpatient mortality) [52]
  • < 66 points: class I, very low risk (0–1.6%, ≤ 1.1%)
  • 66–85 points: class II, low risk (1.7–3.5%, ≤ 1.9%)
  • 86–105 points: class III, intermediate risk (3.2–7.1%, ≤ 4.7%)
  • 106–125 points: class IV, high risk (4.0–11.4%, ≤ 7.0%)
  • > 125 points: class V, very high risk (10.0–23.9%, ≤ 17.2%)
sPESI interpretation (30-day mortality) [53]
  • 0 points: low risk (1%)
  • ≥ 1 point: high risk (10.9%)

Management

General principles [22][48][54]

  • Manage unstable patients using the ABCDE approach (see “Management of massive PE”).
  • Provide oxygen therapy for hypoxic patients.
  • Treat PE based on severity and bleeding risk; start empiric anticoagulation for PE if indicated.
  • Provide analgesia; avoid NSAIDs if possible.
  • Consult a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT), if available: A multidisciplinary team that coordinates the management of patients with PE [48][55]
  • Consider calculating PESI or sPESI score to guide disposition.

Start empiric anticoagulation for PE if clinical suspicion is high unless there is a high risk of bleeding (e.g., recent surgery, hemorrhagic stroke, active bleeding). [48]

Overview of treatment options by severity

Pulmonary embolism treatment by severity and bleeding risk [25][48][54]
Bleeding risk
Low High
Nonmassive PE
  • Anticoagulation for PE in most patients
  • Consider conservative management only for patients with subsegmental PE, no proximal DVT, and a low risk of recurrence
  • Outpatient management is often appropriate.
  • Consider a temporary IVC filter.
Submassive PE
  • Anticoagulation for PE
  • Consider thrombolysis for PE if high risk for decompensation (e.g., severe RV dysfunction) or deterioration despite anticoagulation.
  • Consider a temporary IVC filter.
  • Consider embolectomy for PE in patients at high risk of decompensation.
Massive PE
  • Thrombolysis for PE followed by anticoagulation.
  • Embolectomy for PE if thrombolysis fails.
  • Embolectomy for PE

Unstable patients

Management of massive PE [22][48][54]

  • Hypoxemic respiratory failure: Optimize oxygenation (e.g., using HFNC) and consider mechanical ventilation.
  • Hemodynamic instability
    • Consider ≤ 500 mL IV fluid bolus.
    • Avoid volume overload.
    • Begin vasopressor or inotrope infusion if the patient remains hypotensive, e.g., norepinephrine or dobutamine. [22]
    • Consider temporary mechanical circulatory support.
  • Urgent reperfusion
    • Begin thrombolysis for PE immediately if there are no absolute contraindications to thrombolytics for massive PE.
    • If thrombolysis is contraindicated or fails: Consult interventional radiology or surgery to perform embolectomy for PE. [48]

Avoid volume overload during resuscitation. Aggressive fluid administration can worsen impaired RV function and further decrease cardiac output. [22]

Management of cardiac arrest due to PE [56][57]

  • Start ACLS [56]
  • Consider POCUS to identify indirect signs of PE. [56][58][59][60]
    • Subxiphoid view (consider only during pulse check): thin-walled (< 5 mm), dilated RV
    • Lower extremity views: US findings of DVT
  • Consider intra-arrest thrombolytics (e.g., tPA ). [56][61]
  • Consider ECLS (e.g, VA-ECMO). [5][48]

Stable patients [22][25][54]

  • Symptomatic nonmassive PE and low-risk submassive PE: Prescribe anticoagulation for PE if bleeding risk is low.
  • High-risk submassive PE: Start anticoagulation for PE and consider thrombolysis for PE.
  • Incidentally discovered PE : Treat the same as symptomatic PE.
  • Subsegmental PE : Consider surveillance after ruling out proximal DVT if the risk of recurrence is low.
  • Recurrent VTE: Consider starting low molecular weight heparin if a direct oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist was being used prior to recurrence. [25][62][63]

Disposition [20][22][25][54]

PESI and sPESI score can be used to help guide disposition.

  • Low-risk PE (PESI class I–II or sPESI score = 0)
    • Consider outpatient management in consultation with specialists.
    • Unless contraindicated, begin anticoagulation for PE before discharge and arrange close follow-up.
    • Criteria for outpatient management include:
      • Hemodynamic stability and adequate room air oxygenation
      • Opiates are not required for pain relief.
      • Availability of family or social support, easy access to health care
      • No other major comorbidities or reasons for hospitalization
  • Intermediate-risk PE or high-risk PE (PESI class ≥ III or sPESI score ≥ 1)
    • Hospitalization is required; consult PERT if available.
    • ICU admission: commonly necessary for massive PE or patients with severe RV dysfunction [5]

Anticoagulation

Bleeding risk assessment [25][54][64]

Evaluate a patient's risk for major bleeding and identify contraindications before initiating anticoagulation. [48]

  • See “Risk of major bleeding on anticoagulant therapy in patients with VTE.” [65][66]
  • Contraindications to anticoagulation include : [67][68]
    • Significant active bleeding
    • Recent high-risk bleeding (e.g., intracranial)
    • Recent major surgery
    • Severe thrombocytopenia

The benefits of anticoagulation in PE outweigh the bleeding risks in most patients who do not have an absolute contraindication to anticoagulation. [68]

Empiric anticoagulation for PE [22][25][54][64]

Empiric anticoagulation may be started while waiting for a definitive diagnosis, depending on the risk of bleeding, the PTP of PE, and the expected timing of the diagnostic study.

  • Indications
    • High PTP of PE: Initiate in all patients.
    • Intermediate PTP of PE: Consider in all patients.
    • Low PTP of PE: only if imaging is expected to be delayed for > 24 hours
  • Contraindication: risk of major bleeding on anticoagulant therapy in patients with VTE
  • Choice of medication
    • Stable patients: low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) [64]
    • Unstable patients or patients with renal insufficiency: unfractionated heparin (UFH) [62]

Initial anticoagulation (first 5–10 days) [25][54][62][69]

The selection of the initial anticoagulant depends on the severity of the PE, patient comorbidities, and/or planned concurrent treatment. [48]

  • LMWH (e.g., enoxaparin ) or fondaparinux ; [64][70]
    • Preferred over UFH in most patients with normal renal function [22]
    • Anticoagulant of choice for PE in pregnant patients [22]
    • LMWH is recommended over UFH for patients with cancer. [71]
  • UFH ; [48][69]
    • Preferred in patients with renal failure
    • Preferred if thrombolysis, embolectomy, or mechanical circulatory support are planned
    • Preferred in patients with unpredictable subcutaneous absorption (e.g., patients with obesity, hypoperfusion)
  • Initial oral anticoagulation
    • Consider as initial therapy for low-risk PE.
    • Agents: rivaroxaban or apixaban

Long-term anticoagulation (up to 3 months) [25][54][69]

  • Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)
    • Preferred over vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for most patients
    • No initial parenteral anticoagulation is required with rivaroxaban or apixaban
    • Initial parenteral anticoagulation is required with dabigatran or edoxaban
  • VKA: warfarin
    • Therapeutic target: INR 2–3 [64]
    • Preferred over LMWH when a DOAC cannot be used [69]
  • Long-term parenteral anticoagulation with LMWH
    • Preferred over VKA in patients with cancer if a DOAC cannot be used [71]
    • Preferred in pregnant patients [62]

Extended anticoagulation (> 3 months) [25][54][62]

  • Reassess the need for anticoagulation after 3 months, then annually.
  • Indications for extended anticoagulation
    • Unprovoked PE with a low to moderate risk of bleeding
    • Provoked PE secondary to a chronic risk factor with a low to moderate risk of bleeding
    • Patients with active cancer with any level of bleeding risk [71]

Reperfusion therapy

Bleeding risk assessment [48]

Evaluate a patient's risk for major bleeding and identify contraindications before initiating thrombolytics.

  • Identify risk factors for bleeding in patients with VTE.
  • Evaluate absolute vs. relative contraindications to thrombolysis for PE.
  • Carefully consider the risk-benefit ratio of therapy.
  • Consider the following interventions to reduce bleeding risk: [68]
    • Optimize antihypertensive therapy.
    • Stop or minimize the use of antiplatelet medications and NSAIDs.
    • Correct reversible renal and/or hepatic disease.
    • Treat potential bleeding sources.

Thrombolysis for PE is associated with a high risk of major bleeding.

Thrombolysis for PE [25][48]

Follow local protocols in consultation with a thrombosis specialist.

Systemic thrombolysis [54][62]

  • Procedure: administration of thrombolytic therapy through a peripheral vein
  • Indications
    • Massive PE (hemodynamic instability and/or right heart failure) with a low bleeding risk
    • Nonmassive PE with a low bleeding risk, if patients deteriorate despite anticoagulation
    • Cardiac arrest in patients with suspected PE
  • Contraindications: See “Contraindications to thrombolysis for PE.”
  • Common thrombolytic agents [5][22][72]
    • Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), e.g., alteplase (preferred)
    • Streptokinase
    • Urokinase
  • Management of anticoagulation [73]
    • Discontinue anticoagulation prior to thrombolysis.
    • Check aPTT 2 hours after completion of thrombolysis.
    • Resume anticoagulation when aPTT is < 2 times the upper limit of normal.
  • Complication: hemorrhage during thrombolytic treatment [74]

Catheter-directed thrombolysis [75]

  • Procedure
    • Direct infusion of thrombolytics into the obstructed pulmonary artery via pulmonary arterial catheter
    • May be combined with mechanical or ultrasound fragmentation of the embolus
  • Indication: Alternative to systemic thrombolysis in patients with a high bleeding risk.
  • Contraindications: See “Contraindications to thrombolysis for PE.”

Contraindications

Contraindications to thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism [22][48][62]
Absolute contraindications
  • Active bleeding
  • Prior intracranial hemorrhage
  • Ischemic stroke ≤ 3 months ago
  • Recent spinal or brain surgery
  • Structural intracranial disease
  • Recent head trauma with brain injury or fracture
  • Bleeding diathesis
Relative contraindications
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Current anticoagulation use
  • Recent nonintracranial bleeding
  • Recent surgery, invasive procedure, or trauma
  • Ischemic stroke > 3 months ago
  • Traumatic CPR
  • Pregnancy
  • Age > 75 years
  • Weight < 60 kg
  • Pericardial fluid or pericarditis
  • Diabetic retinopathy

Embolectomy for PE [48]

  • Indications
    • Contraindications to thrombolysis for PE in patients with massive PE or high-risk submassive PE
    • Failure of thrombolysis for PE
  • Options
    • Surgical embolectomy: removal of the embolus through an incision in the pulmonary artery
    • Endovascular embolectomy: catheter-based thrombus removal [75]

Dot phrase

Pulmonary embolism (low-risk, outpatient management)

Assessment: This is a @AGE@-year-old @SEX@ presenting with [**dyspnea, hypoxemia, pleuritic chest pain, tachycardia] who was found to have PE on CTPA, with no [**TTE] or [**biomarker] evidence of right heart strain, and an sPESI score of 0.

Differential diagnoses: AECOPD, acute heart failure, pneumothorax, pneumonia, acute aortic syndromes

Plan: Outpatient management is appropriate because the patient is at low risk of in-hospital mortality, is hemodynamically stable, has adequate oxygenation on ambient air, pain is well controlled without opioids, and has no other major comorbidities or reasons for hospitalization.

Start a DOAC [**Rivaroxaban 15 mg PO twice daily for 21 days, then 20 mg PO once daily] OR [**Apixaban 10 mg PO twice daily for 7 days, then 5 mg PO twice daily]

Follow up with PCP within 3–5 days.

Pulmonary embolism (intermediate to high risk)

Assessment: This is a @AGE@-year-old @SEX@ presenting with [**dyspnea, hypoxemia, pleuritic chest pain, tachycardia] who was found to have PE on CTPA, with [**TTE and/or biomarker] evidence of right heart strain and an sPESI score of [**].

Differential diagnoses: AECOPD, acute heart failure, pneumothorax, pneumonia, acute aortic syndromes

Plan

-Admit to Medicine-Telemetry

-Hemodynamic support PRN

-Respiratory support, including supplemental oxygen, PRN

-Analgesia PRN

-Consult PERT [if available].

Initial anticoagulation

-[Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours OR enoxaparin1.5 mg/kg subcutaneously once daily]

-OR [Weight < 50 kg: fondaparinux 5 mg SQ once daily; weight 50–100 kg: 7.5 mg SQ once daily; weight > 100 kg: 10 mg SQ once daily]

-OR [UFH 80 units/kg IV bolus, then 18 units/kg/hour infusion with aPTT or anti-Xa monitoring]

DOAC after 72 hours of parenteral anticoagulation

-[Dabigatran 150 mg PO twice daily]

-OR [Weight ≤ 60 kg: edoxaban 30 mg PO once daily; weight > 60 kg: edoxaban 60 mg PO once daily

Consider systemic thrombolytic therapy if clinical deterioration occurs.

Pulmonary embolism (high risk - hemodynamically unstable)

Assessment: This is a @AGE@-year-old @SEX@ presenting with [**dyspnea, hypoxemia, pleuritic chest pain, tachycardia] who was found to have PE on CTPA, with [**TTE and/or biomarker] evidence of right heart strain, hemodynamic instability [and/or] hypotension, and an sPESI score of [**].

Differential diagnoses: AECOPD, acute heart failure, pneumothorax, pneumonia, acute aortic syndromes

Plan

-Admit to ICU.

-Continuous telemetry and pulse oximetry

-Limited IV fluid therapy (e.g., LR 250–500 mL bolus) PRN

-Vasopressors PRN

Anticoagulation

-Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours or 1.5 mg/kg subcutaneously once daily

-OR [Weight < 50 kg: fondaparinux 5 mg SQ once daily; weight 50–100 kg: 7.5 mg SQ once daily; weight > 100 kg: 10 mg SQ once daily]

-OR [UFH 80 units/kg IV bolus, then 18 units/kg/hour infusion with aPTT or anti-Xa monitoring]

Thrombolytic therapy

-[Low bleeding risk] Systemic thrombolytic therapy: alteplase 100 mg IV over 2 hours

-[High bleeding risk, failed thrombolytic therapy, or shock] Consult IR or vascular surgery for catheter-assisted embolectomy.

Acute management checklist

Initial management

  • Perform ABCDE assessment.
  • Provide analgesia and oxygen therapy as needed.
  • Unstable patients (i.e., massive PE): Stabilize, obtain ECG, and consider bedside echocardiogram and empiric therapy based on bleeding risk.
  • Stable patients order initial diagnostic based on PTP of PE.
  • Assess bleeding risk on anticoagulation for VTE.
  • Consider empiric anticoagulation if the bleeding risk is low.
  • Evaluate RV function to determine the severity of PE.
  • Consult PERT.

Nonmassive PE

  • Low bleeding risk: Start anticoagulation with a DOAC or heparin.
  • High bleeding risk: Consider IVC filter placement.
  • Consider outpatient management; see “Risk stratification and disposition.”

Submassive PE

  • Low bleeding risk: Start anticoagulation with UFH or LMWH.
  • High bleeding risk: Consider IVC filter placement.
  • Consider thrombolysis for PE in select patients, e.g., those with continued clinical deterioration.
  • Admit to ICU or telemetry.

Massive PE

  • Evaluate the need for mechanical ventilation.
  • Have a crash cart at the bedside.
  • Consider limited IV fluid therapy for hemodynamic support (e.g., 250–500 mL crystalloid fluid IV once).
  • Begin vasopressor infusion for hemodynamic support if needed.
  • Check for contraindications to thrombolysis for PE.
    • No absolute contraindications: Initiate thrombolysis for PE.
    • Absolute contraindications: Consult interventional radiology and/or surgery to perform embolectomy for PE.
  • Continuous telemetry and pulse oximetry.
  • Transfer to ICU.

Cardiac arrest due to suspected PE

  • Start ACLS.
  • Consider administration of a reduced dose of tPA.

Complications

  • High risk of recurrence: Without anticoagulant treatment, the risk of recurrence is ∼ 10% in the first year and ∼ 5% per year after. [21]
  • Right ventricular failure and secondary pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • Sudden cardiac death due to pulseless electrical activity
  • Atelectasis (∼ 20% of cases)
  • Pleural effusion
  • Pulmonary infarction (∼ 10% of cases)
    • Embolisms of smaller segmental arteries can lead to wedge-shaped hemorrhagic pulmonary infarctions.
    • Right ventricular failure, increased bronchial venous pressure, and preexisting pulmonary diseases increase the risk.
    • Patients may present with pneumonia following pulmonary infarction, detected by peripheral infiltration on chest x-ray (typically wedge-shaped = Hampton's hump).
  • Arrhythmia

We list the most important complications. The selection is not exhaustive.

Special patient groups

The approach to suspected PE differs in children and in pregnant and postpartum individuals.

PE in pregnancy and postpartum

  • Individuals are at increased risk of VTE during pregnancy and the postpartum period. [76]
    • Highest risk: postpartum, particularly in the first week
    • During pregnancy: Risk is highest in the third trimester.
  • Common risk factors for VTE in pregnancy include: [76]
    • Previous history of DVT (most significant risk factor)
    • Cesarean delivery [76]

Diagnostics for PE in pregnancy and postpartum [76][77]

Modifications to the standard diagnostic approach to pulmonary embolism are as follows:

  • Initial evaluation [78]
    • Use clinical suspicion to determine whether imaging is required. [76]
    • Avoid using the Wells score, as it is not validated for use in pregnancy or the postpartum period. [79]
  • Imaging [76][77]
    • Initial imaging: CXR
    • Further imaging
      • If CXR is normal: ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy [76]
      • If CXR is abnormal: CTPA [77]

PE may be diagnosed based on clinical suspicion for PE and Doppler ultrasound findings of lower-extremity DVT. [77]

D-dimer is unreliable in pregnancy and is generally not indicated. [76]

Management of PE in pregnancy and postpartum [76]

  • Initial management of PE does not differ significantly from nonpregnant patients.
  • Initiate reperfusion therapy for PE if there is life-threatening hemodynamic instability. [80]
  • Consider hospitalization in the following: [76]
    • Hemodynamic instability
    • Significant comorbidities
    • Large clots
  • For information on anticoagulation, see “Management of DVT in pregnancy and postpartum.”Prevention of PE in pregnancy and postpartum

See “Prevention of VTE in pregnancy and postpartum.”

PE in children

  • Pediatric PE is uncommon; estimated incidence is 0.14–9.2 per 10,000 hospitalized children annually. [81][82]
  • Most patients have an underlying risk factor for pediatric VTE; unprovoked PE is rare in children. [83][84]
  • Clinical features of PE are similar in adults and children. [82][84]
    • Dyspnea and chest pain are common.
    • Up to 16% of children with PE are asymptomatic. [85]

Maintain high clinical suspicion for PE in children with risk factors for pediatric VTE, as symptoms may be nonspecific. [82][84]

Approach [84][86]

Manage all pediatric PE in consultation with a pediatric hematologist.

  • Hemodynamically unstable patients (e.g., with hypotension or other clinical features of shock)
    • Use the ABCDE approach.
    • Consult PICU.
    • Provide supportive care as indicated (e.g., oxygen therapy, vasopressors).
    • Perform diagnostics for pediatric PE.
      • Obtain laboratory studies, ECG, and echocardiography in all patients.
      • Obtain confirmatory imaging (e.g., CTPA) when it can be performed safely.
    • Initiate treatment.
  • Hemodynamically stable patients
    • Perform diagnostics for pediatric PE.
    • Initiate treatment based on presence and severity of symptoms.

In unstable patients with evidence of right heart strain on echocardiography, initiation of anticoagulation for pediatric VTE may precede confirmatory imaging. [84]

Diagnostics for pediatric PE [84][85][86]

See “Diagnostic studies for PE” for details on performing and interpreting tests.

  • Initial evaluation [84]
    • Laboratory studies: CBC, coagulation panel (including fibrinogen and D-dimer), lactate, BNP, troponin
    • ECG: to assess for high-risk ECG findings of PE
  • Confirmatory imaging
    • CTPA: preferred [87]
    • Alternatives (e.g., in patients with contraindications to iodinated IV contrast) [82]
      • V/Q scan
      • Magnetic resonance angiography
      • Pulmonary angiography: typically reserved for patients requiring intervention [87]
  • Additional testing
    • Echocardiography: to identify thrombus and/or evidence of right heart strain
    • CXR: to exclude alternative diagnoses (e.g., pneumonia)
    • Evaluation for an underlying cause, e.g.: [86]
      • Venous imaging to assess for DVT
      • Thrombophilia testing in patients with no apparent risk factors for pediatric VTE
      • See “DVT in children” for details.

Prediction rules (e.g., Wells criteria for PE, PERC) and D-dimer levels have limited diagnostic utility in children. [82][84]

Treatment of pediatric PE [84][86]

  • Symptomatic PE
    • Start anticoagulation for pediatric VTE in all patients without contraindications to anticoagulation.
    • Consider thrombolysis or embolectomy before anticoagulation for critical patients
  • Clinically unsuspected (asymptomatic) PE: Expectant management or long-term anticoagulation for pediatric VTE may be appropriate. [86]

Related One-Minute Telegram

  • One-Minute Telegram 83-2023-1/3: Hormonal contraception and NSAIDs: a risky tango
  • One-Minute Telegram 68-2023-1/3: After orthopedic trauma, two aspirin a day keep fatal blood clots away
  • One-Minute Telegram 9-2020-3/3: Commonly used scores for pulmonary embolism are only moderately useful in predicting short-term mortality

Interested in the newest medical research, distilled down to just one minute? Sign up for the One-Minute Telegram in “Tips and links” below.

External Resources

References

  1. Ageno W, Squizzato A, Wells PS, Büller HR, Johnson G. "The diagnosis of symptomatic recurrent pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH". Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 11(8). :1597-1602. (2013)
  2. Beckman MG, Hooper WC, Critchley SE, Ortel TL. "Venous Thromboembolism". Am J Prev Med. 38(4). :S495-S501. (2010)
  3. Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL, et al. "Management of Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism, Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis, and Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension". Circulation. 123(16). :1788-1830. (2011)
  4. Aujesky D, Obrosky DS, Stone RA, et al. "Derivation and Validation of a Prognostic Model for Pulmonary Embolism". Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 172(8). :1041-1046. (2005)
  5. Jiménez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, et al. "Simplification of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index for Prognostication in Patients With Acute Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism". Arch Intern Med. 170(15). :1383-9. (2010)
  6. Calkovska A, Mokra D, Calkovsky V. "Lung surfactant alterations in pulmonary thromboembolism". Eur J Med Res. 14(Suppl 4). :38. (2009)
  7. Lyhne MD, Kline JA, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Andersen A. "Pulmonary vasodilation in acute pulmonary embolism – a systematic review". Pulmonary Circulation. 10(1). :204589401989977. (2020)
  8. Walls R, Hockberger R, Gausche-Hill M, Erickson TB, Wilcox SR. "Rosen's Emergency Medicine 10th edition- Concepts and Clinical Practice E-Book". Elsevier Health Sciences. (2022). ISBN: 9780323757904
  9. Hirmerova J, Seidlerova J, Chudacek Z. "The Prevalence of Concomitant Deep Vein Thrombosis, Symptomatic or Asymptomatic, Proximal or Distal, in Patients With Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism". Clin Appl Thromb Hemost.. 24(8). :1352-1357. (2018)
  10. Han Y, Gong Y. "Pulmonary embolism with abdominal pain as the chief complaint". Medicine. 98(44). :e17791. (2019)
  11. "COVID-19 Vaccines Work". https://web.archive.org/web/20220207134517/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/effectiveness/work.html
  12. Hagio K, Sugano N, Takashina M, et al. "Embolic events during total hip arthroplasty: An echocardiographic study". J Arthroplasty. 18(2). :186-192. (2003)
  13. Visnjevac O, Pourafkari L, Nader ND. "Role of Perioperative Monitoring in Diagnosis of Massive Intraoperative Cardiopulmonary Embolism". J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 6(3). :141-145. (2014)
  14. Agnelli G, Becattini C. "Acute Pulmonary Embolism". N Engl J Med. 363(3). :266-274. (2010)
  15. Raja AS, Greenberg JO, Qaseem A, et al. "Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians". Ann Intern Med. 163(9). :701-11. (2015)
  16. Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al. "2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS)". Eur Respir J. 54(3). :1901647. (2019)
  17. Moore AJE, Wachsmann J, Chamarthy MR, et al. "Imaging of acute pulmonary embolism: an update". Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 8(3). :225-243. (2018)
  18. Needleman L, Cronan JJ, Lilly MP, et al. "Ultrasound for Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis". Circulation. 137(14). :1505-1515. (2018)
  19. Ortel TL, Neumann I, Ageno W, et al. "American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism". Blood Advances. 4(19). :4693-4738. (2020)
  20. Schouten HJ, Geersing GJ, Koek HL, et al. "Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis". BMJ. 346. :f2492-f2492. (2013)
  21. Wolf SJ, Hahn SA, Nentwich LM, et al. "Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Evaluation and Management of Adult Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Suspected Acute Venous Thromboembolic Disease". Ann Emerg Med. 71(5). :e59-e109. (2018)
  22. Rodger MA, Carrier M, Jones GN, et al. "Diagnostic Value of Arterial Blood Gas Measurement in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism". Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 162(6). :2105-2108. (2000)
  23. Stein PD, Goldhaber SZ, Henry JW, Miller AC. "Arterial Blood Gas Analysis in the Assessment of Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism". Chest. 109(1). :78-81. (1996)
  24. Kuperman A, López-Reyes R, et al. "Anemia and bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism". J Thromb Thrombolysis. 45(3). :360-368. (2018)
  25. Overton DT. "The Alveolar-Arterial Oxygen Gradient in Patients With Documented Pulmonary Embolism". Arch Intern Med. 148(7). :1617. (1988)
  26. Co I, Eilbert W, Chiganos T. "New Electrocardiographic Changes in Patients Diagnosed with Pulmonary Embolism". J Emerg Med. 52(3). :280-285. (2017)
  27. Alreshq R, Hsu G, Torosoff M. "Acute Pulmonary Embolism Presenting with Symptomatic Bradycardia: A Case Report and Review of the Literature". Am J Case Rep. 20. :748-752. (2019)
  28. Wilbur J, Shian B. "Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.". Am Fam Physician. 86(10). :913-9. (2012)
  29. Chornenki NLJ, Poorzargar K, Shanjer M, et al. "Detection of right ventricular dysfunction in acute pulmonary embolism by computed tomography or echocardiography: A systematic review and meta‐analysis". J Thromb Haemost. 19(10). :2504-2513. (2021)
  30. Sostman HD, Stein PD, Gottschalk A, et al. "Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Sensitivity and Specificity of Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy in PIOPED II Study". Radiology. 246(3). :941-946. (2008)
  31. Meyerovitz MF, Mannting F, Polak JF, Goldhaber SZ. "Frequency of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with Low-Probability Lung Scan and Negative Lower Extremity Venous Ultrasound". Chest. 115(4). :980-982. (1999)
  32. Van Rossum AB, van Houwelingen HC, Kieft GJ, Pattynama PM. "Prevalence of deep vein thrombosis in suspected and proven pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.". Br J Radiol. 71(852). :1260-1265. (1998)
  33. Lieveld A, Heldeweg MLA, Smit JM, et al. "Multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound for detection of pulmonary embolism in critically ill COVID-19 patients – A diagnostic accuracy study". J Crit Care. 69. :153992. (2022)
  34. Squizzato A, Galli L, Gerdes VEA. "Point-of-care ultrasound in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism". Crit Ultrasound J. 7(1). (2015)
  35. Daley JI, Dwyer KH, Grunwald Z, et al. "Increased Sensitivity of Focused Cardiac Ultrasound for Pulmonary Embolism in Emergency Department Patients With Abnormal Vital Signs". Acad Emerg Med. 26(11). :1211-1220. (2019)
  36. Stein PD. "Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Pulmonary Embolism". Ann Intern Med. 152(7). :434-43. (2010)
  37. Fields JM, Davis J, Girson L, et al. "Transthoracic Echocardiography for Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.". J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 30(7). :714-723.e4. (2017)
  38. Dutta T, Frishman WH, Aronow WS. "Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism". Cardiol Rev. 25(6). :309-314. (2017)
  39. Shopp JD, Stewart LK, Emmett TW, Kline JA. "Findings From 12-lead Electrocardiography That Predict Circulatory Shock From Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis". Acad Emerg Med. 22(10). :1127-1137. (2015)
  40. Geibel A, Zehender M, Kasper W, et al. "Prognostic value of the ECG on admission in patients with acute major pulmonary embolism". European Respiratory Journal. 25(5). :843-848. (2005)
  41. Müller-Bardorff M, Weidtmann B, Giannitsis E, Kurowski V, Katus HA. "Release kinetics of cardiac troponin T in survivors of confirmed severe pulmonary embolism.". Clin Chem. 48(4). :673-5. (2002)
  42. Klok FA, Mos ICM, Huisman MV. "Brain-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels in the Prediction of Adverse Outcome in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism". Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 178(4). :425-430. (2008)
  43. Rivera-Lebron B, McDaniel M, Ahrar K, et al. "Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow Up of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Consensus Practice from the PERT Consortium". Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 25. :107602961985303. (2019)
  44. Connors JM. "Thrombophilia Testing and Venous Thrombosis". N Engl J Med. 377(12). :1177-1187. (2017)
  45. Douma RA, Mos ICM, Erkens PMG, et al. "Performance of 4 Clinical Decision Rules in the Diagnostic Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism". Ann Intern Med. 154(11). :709-18. (2011)
  46. Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. "2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain". J Am Coll Cardiol. 78(22). :e187-e285. (2021)
  47. Wells PS. "Use of a Clinical Model for Safe Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism". Ann Intern Med. 129(12). :997-1005. (1998)
  48. Ceriani E, Combescure C, Le Gal G, et al. "Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis". J Thromb Haemost. (2010)
  49. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. "Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer.". Thromb Haemost. 83(3). :416-20. (2000)
  50. Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy P-M, et al. "Prediction of Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department: The Revised Geneva Score". Ann Intern Med. 144(3). :165-171. (2006)
  51. Kline JA, Courtney DM, Kabrhel C, et al. "Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria". J Thromb Haemost. 6(5). :772-780. (2008)
  52. Kline JA, Mitchell AM, Kabrhel C, Richman PB, Courtney DM. "Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism". J Thromb Haemost. 2(8). :1247-1255. (2004)
  53. Fineschi V, Turillazzi E, Neri M, Pomara C, Riezzo I. "Histological age determination of venous thrombosis: A neglected forensic task in fatal pulmonary thrombo-embolism". Forensic Sci Int. 186(1-3). :22-28. (2009)
  54. Stevens SM, Woller SC, Kreuziger LB, et al. "Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease". Chest. 160(6). :e545-e608. (2021)
  55. Chaudhury P, Gadre S, Schneider E, et al. "Impact of Multidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Team Availability on Management and Outcomes.". Am J Cardiol. 124(9). :1465-1469. (2019)
  56. Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, et al. "Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care". Circulation. 142(16_suppl_2). (2020)
  57. Cao D, Arens A, Chow S, et al. "Part 10: Adult and Pediatric Special Circumstances of Resuscitation: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care". Circulation. 152(16_suppl_2). (2025)
  58. Atkinson P, Bowra J, Milne J, et al. "International Federation for Emergency Medicine Consensus Statement: Sonography in hypotension and cardiac arrest (SHoC): An international consensus on the use of point of care ultrasound for undifferentiated hypotension and during cardiac arrest". CJEM. 19(06). :459-470. (2016)
  59. Ávila-Reyes D, Acevedo-Cardona AO, Gómez-González JF, et al. "Point-of-care ultrasound in cardiorespiratory arrest (POCUS-CA): narrative review article". Ultrasound J. 13(1). (2021)
  60. Wigginton J, Agarwal S, Bartos J, et al. "Part 9: Adult Advanced Life Support: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care". Circulation. 152(16_suppl_2). (2025)
  61. Alshaya OA, Alshaya AI, Badreldin HA, et al. "Thrombolytic therapy in cardiac arrest caused by cardiac etiologies or presumed pulmonary embolism: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis". Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 6(4). (2022)
  62. Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J, et al. "Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease". Chest. 149(2). :315-352. (2016)
  63. Schulman S. "How I treat recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy". Blood. 129(25). :3285-3293. (2017)
  64. Klok FA, Huisman MV. "How I assess and manage the risk of bleeding in patients treated for venous thromboembolism". Blood. 135(10). :724-734. (2020)
  65. Fogo AB, Lusco MA, Najafian B, Alpers CE. "AJKD Atlas of Renal Pathology: Postinfectious Glomerulonephritis". Am J Kidney Dis. 66(4). :e31-e32. (2015)
  66. Condliffe R, Elliot CA, Hughes RJ, et al. "Management dilemmas in acute pulmonary embolism". Thorax. 69(2). :174-180. (2013)
  67. Daley MJ, Murthy MS, Peterson EJ. "Bleeding risk with systemic thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism: scope of the problem". Ther Adv Drug Saf. 6(2). :57-66. (2015)
  68. Giri J, Sista AK, Weinberg I, et al. "Interventional Therapies for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Current Status and Principles for the Development of Novel Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association". Circulation. 140(20). (2019)
  69. Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ, et al. "Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.". Chest. 141(2 Suppl). :e419S-e496S. (2012)
  70. Klok FA, Niemann C, Dellas C, et al. "Performance of five different bleeding-prediction scores in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.". J Thromb Thrombolysis. 41(2). :312-20. (2016)
  71. Mathonier C, Meneveau N, Besutti M, et al. "Available Bleeding Scoring Systems Poorly Predict Major Bleeding in the Acute Phase of Pulmonary Embolism". J Clin Med. 10(16). :3615. (2021)
  72. Steinberg BA, Greiner MA, Hammill BG, et al. "Contraindications to Anticoagulation Therapy and Eligibility for Novel Anticoagulants in Older Patients with Atrial Fibrillation". Cardiovasc Ther. 33(4). :177-183. (2015)
  73. Wilbur J, Shian B. "Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism: Current Therapy.". Am Fam Physician. 95(5). :295-302. (2017)
  74. Konstantinides SV, Barco S, Lankeit M, Meyer G. "Management of Pulmonary Embolism". J Am Coll Cardiol. 67(8). :976-990. (2016)
  75. Lyman GH, Carrier M, Ay C, et al. "American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer". Blood Adv. 5(4). :927-974. (2021)
  76. ACOG. "ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 196: Thromboembolism in Pregnancy". Obstetrics & Gynecology. 132(1). :e1-e17. (2018)
  77. Expert Panel on Cardiac Imaging, Kirsch J, Wu CC, et al. "ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: 2022 Update". J Am Coll Radiol. 19(11S). :S488-S501. (2022)
  78. Leung AN, Bull TM, Jaeschke R, et al. "American Thoracic Society documents: an official American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology Clinical Practice Guideline - Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy". Radiology. 262(2). :635-46. (2012)
  79. Eddy M, Robert-Ebadi H, Richardson L, et al. "External validation of the YEARS diagnostic algorithm for suspected pulmonary embolism". J Thromb Haemost. 18(12). :3289-3295. (2020)
  80. Blondon M, Martinez de Tejada B, Glauser F, Righini M, Robert-Ebadi H. "Management of high-risk pulmonary embolism in pregnancy". Thromb Res. 204. :57-65. (2021)
  81. Rastogi R, Okunowo O, Faerber JA, et al. "Incidence, Management, and Outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism at Tertiary Pediatric Hospitals in the United States". JACC Adv.. 3(4). :100895. (2024)
  82. Navanandan N, Stein J, Mistry RD. "Pulmonary Embolism in Children". Pediatr Emerg Care. 35(2). :143-151. (2019)
  83. Wolf S, Valerio L, Kucher N, et al. "Acute pulmonary embolism in children and adolescents in the USA (2016 and 2019): a nationwide retrospective cohort study". Lancet Respir Med.. 13(5). :393-402. (2025)
  84. Ross C, Kumar R, Pelland-Marcotte MC, et al. "Acute Management of High-Risk and Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism in Children: A Review". Chest. 161(3). :791-802. (2022)
  85. Ramiz S, Rajpurkar M. "Pulmonary Embolism in Children". Pediatr Clin North Am. 65(3). :495-507. (2018)
  86. Monagle P, Azzam M, Bercovitz R, et al. "American Society of Hematology/International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2024 updated guidelines for treatment of venous thromboembolism in pediatric patients". Blood Adv. 9(10). :2587-2636. (2025)
  87. Thacker PG, Lee EY. "Pulmonary Embolism in Children". American Journal of Roentgenology. 204(6). :1278-1288. (2015)